2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:Verelst's Laws

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

How is that a probability? Tmtoulouse, and nobody else 04:07, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm guessing, based on the other article, that these laws are intended to be parodies of creationist talking points. — Unsigned, by: ORavenhurst / talkDo You Believe That? 04:09, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Clarification: I hope that's the intention. — Unsigned, by: ORavenhurst / talkDo You Believe That? 04:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
The probability is based on this. If we get for example 9 / 10 = 0.9
That's 90%. If we go above 1, its still 100 %
Signed = Agnostico Rationale
I'm guessing there's some butthurt involved in all this, given the Raphael Verelst entry by the same user. I'd say both are not notable, especially as no links or citations are provided. --Psygremlin (talk) 09:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)