Template talk:BigTalkHead

This is an excellent idea, Frohlich. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 23:28, 5 January 2009 (EST)

Thought so myself. (or I wouldn't have done it) Frohlich 23:36, 5 January 2009 (EST)

The third line contradicts the first line, though. ħuman 23:55, 5 January 2009 (EST)

It's intended to mean: "If you're bent on not using the +, then add your thing @ the bottom" I don't see a contradiction. It might be superfluous as Pi said on WIGO. Frohlich 00:03, 6 January 2009 (EST)

Well, as I said, it dilutes the message, which is "USE THE FUCKING + TO MAKE NEW SECTIONS!!111!!!". By the way, the "+" thing could be linked as a "click here top make a new section". ħuman 00:07, 6 January 2009 (EST)

I've vanished it. So it's academic now. Frohlich 00:10, 6 January 2009 (EST)

I saw that... it could have been useful with some tweaks. Sorry if I came on strong re: line 3 vs. 1... we can always resurrect it, right? ħuman 00:13, 6 January 2009 (EST)

How about something about the use of sub-sections if we topic begins to wander? - User $\scriptstyle 4\sum _{n=0}^{\infty }(-1)^{n}(2n+1)^{-1}$ 00:16, 6 January 2009 (EST)

<sulking>Do what you want: I'm going to my room.</sulking> Frohlich 00:17, 6 January 2009 (EST)

Hehe, why, is there a better computer in there? ħuman 00:52, 6 January 2009 (EST)

Rather than Pi's addition (& my amendments to it), I'd rather remove that third line altogether. If someone's in a thread they won't see it anyhow because it'll be at the top & presumably out of screen. Also it's long & makes the box too full so people won't bother with it. Out with it! say I. Frohlich 00:57, 6 January 2009 (EST)

That's better, Human, but I still think it's superfluous to an extent. Frohlich 01:00, 6 January 2009 (EST)