Template talk:Cpmothball

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Conservapedia isn't "essentially dead" - it is as alive and kicking as ever. It just isn't interesting as they don't come up with any new ways to embarrass themselves any more. ħumanUser talk:Human 04:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

You're right; good rewrite. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 05:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. These things often take a few people working together over multiple drafts to get write. Like, in this case, fixing my multiple speling erors! ħumanUser talk:Human 16:12, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Should we perhaps change the wiki-jargon phrase "Conservapedia-space" to the more layperson-friendly "Conservapedia-related"? ħumanUser talk:Human 16:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Yep! Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 17:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)