Template talk:EligibleVoters

Why? Seriously, you are making this overcomplicated and this is unncessary templatecruft. I also think it's best to keep the two sets eligibility criteria separate entirely. Sterile (talk) 12:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

ADD:It's also not a given that the eligibility requirements will change. I think it's probably better to have them accurate to the year's criteria then having them automatically change, which will be confusing. Sterile (talk) 13:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Overcomplicated: Not sure how this is complicated?

Unnecessary templatecruft: The template makes voting requirements standard across a few pages, which, like having a standard mission template, seems useful.

Separate: If you wanna make another template, go ahead. Otherwise, this template accurately reflects the voting requirements for RW's two non-universally-open voting systems.

Requirements changing: I'm not sure what you mean here.

FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 14:11, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

It's not a given that the eligibility requirements in 2014 will be the same as in 2015 or in 2016. Sterile (talk) 14:31, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Then we can change the template, and it will update all the pages instead of us having to manually do each one... ? FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 16:45, 14 January 2015 (UTC)