Template talk:Essaydispute

Small-time edit war

I thought that anti-Conservapedia, pro-rationalism was the only party line? Lyra Silvertongue 15:13, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

Pretty much, and not everyone is even in on the first one. ħuman 15:18, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

Stop repeating yourself, Lyra :P Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)^{Approach the Presence} 15:21, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

Stop repeating yourself, Jellyfish. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Diane, I'm at RationalWiki again...} 15:30, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

Shan't. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!^{Diane, I'm at RationalWiki again...} 15:30, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

Dumb template. ħuman 21:20, 28 February 2009 (EST)

Should we delete it then? It's only used on one essay. If we keep it, we really need to reword what it says. ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:29, 28 February 2009 (EST)

Yeah, I'd say to kill it. Driveby is the only one we need (for essays), for people who turn up, write crap, and don't stick around to defend it. This one assumes "consensus", which at the best of times, and for the best of reasons, we never have. ħuman 22:01, 28 February 2009 (EST)