2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $10064.65Goal: $10000

Template talk:Essaydispute

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Small-time edit war[edit]

I thought that anti-Conservapedia, pro-rationalism was the only party line? Lyra Silvertongue 15:13, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

Pretty much, and not everyone is even in on the first one. ħumanUser talk:Human 15:18, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Stop repeating yourself, Lyra :P Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)Approach the Presence 15:21, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Stop repeating yourself, Jellyfish. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!That's why I have this doomed expression. You haven't noticed my doomed expression. 15:30, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Shan't. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!That's why I have this doomed expression. You haven't noticed my doomed expression. 15:30, 9 June 2008 (EDT)
Dumb template. ħumanUser talk:Human 21:20, 28 February 2009 (EST)
Should we delete it then? It's only used on one essay. If we keep it, we really need to reword what it says. WèàšèìòìďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 21:29, 28 February 2009 (EST)
Yeah, I'd say to kill it. Driveby is the only one we need (for essays), for people who turn up, write crap, and don't stick around to defend it. This one assumes "consensus", which at the best of times, and for the best of reasons, we never have. ħumanUser talk:Human 22:01, 28 February 2009 (EST)