Template talk:Holydaze/0521

Any chance of automating the # of years? PS, I'm gonna transclude the 0522 one from this one so only one has to be "improved". ħuman 21:07, 4 November 2008 (EST)

While this is hilarious, the link is not very functional. ħuman 04:23, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

And we will delete in a couple days, right? ħuman 04:24, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

The link is perfectly fine for me. Chthonios (talk) 04:54, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

I didn't know it was a link, not that I'da clicked it anyways...maybe cause we forced it to be black? 04:58, 21 May 2011 (UTC) C®ackeЯ

It worked this time. It's probably getting a lot of hits right now from the unsaved seeking to remedy the errors of their ways. That is, trying to dial in their lathes to precision again. ħuman 05:47, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Linky's fine for me. I only included it to make it obvious there's supposed to be a rapture to anyone who didn't know as we don't have our own article here about it yet. Having said that, most people would've heard about it by now, so I suppose it can be removed if anyone wants to. SJ ^Debaser 10:28, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm changing this back to a transclusion of 5/22 now, since this will never happen again on this date. ħuman 04:34, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Human 2011, meet Human 2009. - π 04:48, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, but now it displays twice. -- Nx / talk 05:15, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

That is why I deleted it. - π 05:16, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Oh shoot you're right. Don't be assholes about it, though. How can we make it run for two days without the doubling? ħuman 06:16, 22 May 2011 (UTC)