2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

new thread

Jump to navigation Jump to search

I heard one person say that text size was an issue. And that was something that I couldn't see myself. Everything else is "this is fugly" "this is awful". This isn't constructive in the slightest.

Scarlet A.pngmoral21:37, 21 November 2010

Well, let's look at some posts:

"This is awful"

"This is shit"

"Judging by heavy opposition"

"Eesh this is shit"

I'm hardly seeing some extremely in depth technical reasoning here.

Scarlet A.pngmoral21:39, 21 November 2010

Have you even read my comments on the matter at the bottom of the page?

Educated stupid Hoover!21:41, 21 November 2010