There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Moves / Liquid threads
Moves / Liquid threads
Why not? Also, when posting in a liquid thread, you do not need the name signing code, ~~~~.
1. Because you've been asked not to. 2. Because your first such edit was reverted before you made the second. 3. You've been here 2 minutes and seem to be targeting random pages to convert. 4. If you look through the Saloon Bar archives, you'll see that we are not going to implement liquid threads on talk pages. Users can for their talk pages, but that's it for now.
Let me explain why I did it twice, the first time I did it, I thought it was reverted because the content page had been deleted, which itself is something I didn't realise until after doing that move.
If you look through the Saloon Bar archives, you'll see that we are not going to implement liquid threads on talk pages.
I hadn't seen that, I assume you are referring to this discussion