User talk:Myrtone

--Bertran (talk) 13:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

You've been demoted to janitorial status. Read this and tidy up after yourself.  Lily ^{Inspirate me.} 12:14, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Set up as you requested.

Why are you deleting ancient revisions. This is weird.

Just hiding spam and insults from public view, surely this is understandable.

It's weird to go so far back and remove things so tame.

There's also no reason to revdel spam.

Surely those who run this site don't want to host spam anywhere.

The site still hosts it, even if you "delete" it

Hopefully this flow thingy talk page work still.

You were made a sysop in 2011. For some reason I cannot fathom, you became "not a sysop" without it being removed.

I have thus made you a sysop again.

See Special:UserRights/Myrtone.

Have fun.

Hello! Finally, I have finished translation of the article. It will be on the follow constant adress: User:Bertran/Христианство_edited; and I'll not change it. The article [[Христианство]] can be (but, as it seems, not will be in the nearest future) changed and improved by a convergence with a problems, which are actual for Russia, such as by considering Orthodox Church. As for this text I want to say that some sentences were translated roughly and some sentences I had to reconstruct. But, I think, if you'll compare Russian and English variants, you can understand some important specifications of Russian spelling.--Bertran (talk) 19:19, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

I have replied to your e-mail. MY apologies for not having a timely response.

So long as you do NOT prevent people from actually editing your talkpage, you should be able to lock the LQT header yourself, since you are a sysop now. If you have any more questions or need any more help, feel free to ask me. I don't bite (anymore....)

He can't respond, Lily blocked him for 3 months, and he hasn't unblocked himself.

Go to recent changes, and scroll through until you see "block log" from there, it should be easy to figure out

Out of idle curiosity, what are you doing?

Just some testing, test over.

Ok, thank you.

Please don't create any more of these. --Ψ GremlinTala! 13:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Why not? Also, when posting in a liquid thread, you do not need the name signing code, ~~~~.

1. Because you've been asked not to. 2. Because your first such edit was reverted before you made the second. 3. You've been here 2 minutes and seem to be targeting random pages to convert. 4. If you look through the Saloon Bar archives, you'll see that we are not going to implement liquid threads on talk pages. Users can for their talk pages, but that's it for now.

Let me explain why I did it twice, the first time I did it, I thought it was reverted because the content page had been deleted, which itself is something I didn't realise until after doing that move.

If you look through the Saloon Bar archives, you'll see that we are not going to implement liquid threads on talk pages.

I hadn't seen that, I assume you are referring to this discussion