Quid pro quo

I butted in your and Chicken Man's psychoanalysis after finding it per RC while signing up for aSK. I may have a guess, but much like in the case of Ken

, it is based on interpretation of nonsense.--George (talk) 03:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Huh? Who? What?

I mean your psychobabble with the Colonel. He kinda reminds me of Ken

. That is what I was referring to above.

Ah. Alrighty then...

I think I have an explanation for his fascist cheerleader nonsense that has clogged this wiki's block log.--George (talk) 03:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Oh. Okay. Please don't use that stupid template on my talkpage. Cheers!

The Kendoll one?--George (talk) 03:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Yeah.

Also, why Trinity over Holy Trinity?--George (talk) 03:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Cause I'm a sec-hume bastard Because that is the larger, nicer article.

But, there are many trinities, but only one Holy Trinity. The Three Stooges could be called a trinity.--George (talk) 03:46, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

The three stooges are hardly mission-centric

True. But still. Quit being such a secular humanist.--George (talk) 03:50, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to RationalWIki.

I have been here.I know the userbase.--George (talk) 03:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Then you should know better.

I should.--George (talk) 04:00, 18 July 2011 (UTC)