Quid pro quo

Jump to navigation Jump to search

I butted in your and Chicken Man's psychoanalysis after finding it per RC while signing up for aSK. I may have a guess, but much like in the case of Ken, it is based on interpretation of nonsense.--George (talk) 03:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

George (talk)03:09, 18 July 2011

Huh? Who? What?

Тysic semper03:10, 18 July 2011

I mean your psychobabble with the Colonel. He kinda reminds me of Ken. That is what I was referring to above.

George (talk)03:14, 18 July 2011

Ah. Alrighty then...

ТyYes?03:14, 18 July 2011

I think I have an explanation for his fascist cheerleader nonsense that has clogged this wiki's block log.--George (talk) 03:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

George (talk)03:17, 18 July 2011

Oh. Okay. Please don't use that stupid template on my talkpage. Cheers!

ТyLonely. Ever so lonely.03:18, 18 July 2011

The Kendoll one?--George (talk) 03:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

George (talk)03:20, 18 July 2011

Yeah.

ТySerious Business Guy03:22, 18 July 2011

Also, why Trinity over Holy Trinity?--George (talk) 03:33, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

George (talk)03:33, 18 July 2011

Cause I'm a sec-hume bastard Because that is the larger, nicer article.

Тyrant03:33, 18 July 2011

But, there are many trinities, but only one Holy Trinity. The Three Stooges could be called a trinity.--George (talk) 03:46, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

George (talk)03:46, 18 July 2011

The three stooges are hardly mission-centric

ТyLonely. Ever so lonely.03:46, 18 July 2011

True. But still. Quit being such a secular humanist.--George (talk) 03:50, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

George (talk)03:50, 18 July 2011

Welcome to RationalWIki.

Тyrant03:53, 18 July 2011

I have been here.I know the userbase.--George (talk) 03:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

George (talk)03:55, 18 July 2011

Then you should know better.

Тyrannis03:56, 18 July 2011

I should.--George (talk) 04:00, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

George (talk)04:00, 18 July 2011