There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User:Π/Sandbox2
Example - Civil Rights Act[edit]
CNN made a classic mistake of ignoring a confounding variable in their retrospective on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, by repeating the myth that more Republicans supported the bill,[1] going so far as to link to an article that explains why the opposite its true.[2] On the surface the argument seems compelling:
Democratic | Republican | |
---|---|---|
House | 152 of 243 (62.5%) | 137 of 172 (79.6%) |
Senate | 46 of 67 (68.6%) | 27 of 33 (81.8%) |
Overall | 198 of 310 (63.9%) | 164 of 205 (80.0%) |
They ignored the fact that it was not simply a Democratic/Republican divide, there was also a North/South divide