User:Ioe bidome/Insanity

I have discovered an extremely bizarre troll on Wikipedia.

This is a response to this gibberish posted on wikipedia. No grammatical errors from the original post have been fixed.

Insanity

Response

Arzawa ancient greek from proto-hellenic, helleno-pelasgian root SYR SAR ARS ARZ for high and bright shining, related to the root KOR POR SOR for stone, high and connection/passage, Like in Syros, Syria, Sardon, Sardinia, Sardelles anchovies.

The post contains the usual "if word X in one language looks like Y word in another, then the two must be related" mistake non-linguists make. The variety of the forms being compared makes it easy to find similarities. Also, "sardelles" is a type of fish and has nothing to do with place names, and even less to do with stones, height, or connection, and passage.

And ISBE iswe isp asp asw dialectical exchange of the labial and bilabial p/b/w/ph consonants. The Sigma S transforms to a Digamma F, aFp, the Digamma F affects the P and doubles it to Hippo horse. Hippo = Kappa like in Kappadokia δεχομαι dekhomai receive, accept δοχη doche receptacle, reception, feast, acception, service for horses = awa City of the brigthshining horses.

In ancient Greek, the Sigma represented the sound /s/, and the Digamma represented /w/ before it was lost. There is no known sound change where Ancient Greek /s/ became /w/. There is also no known sound change where /p/ becomes doubled after /w/. Since /w/ existed in Proto-Greek, there is no need for the "dialectal interchange" of the "p/b/w/ph" (f) consonants. The post confuses sounds with the letters that represent them. Also, the post compares "hippo" with "kappa" and completely ignores the initial consonant and first vowel.

Anatolias, Asian minors topo- and ethnonyms are ancient greek!!!! Instead of delivering us with scientific proven evidence and truth, we have to refute with scientific proven evidence: pseudo-theories, fallacies and wrong terminologies, based not on science, but on everything else like political or religious, propagandistic, dogmatic intentions.

This is the most incomprehensible part of the whole post. Who benefits from denying that the place name "Arzawa" is not Greek? The Poster is from Greece, so it's possible we're dealing with a Greek nationalist.

This is not the end of the user's posts. There is a second post, on the talk page of late linguist Robert Beekes. Robert Beekes had a theory that much of Ancient Greek vocabulary was borrowed from a substrate language that existed in Greece, called, Pre-Greek.

More insanity

Response

Wrong terminologies like pre-greek and the pseudo-indoeuropean-indogermanic-hypothesis are unproved and since years refuted. Support true paideia = education through science and proved, verified evidence and truth. Instead pseudo-pedia. Everything what is not science has probably political, religious, dogmatic, propagandistic source and intention.

Who refuted "pre-Greek"? Who refuted "the pseudo-indoeuropean-indogermanic-hypothesis"?

There is a third post, but it's a regurgitation of the previous claims: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2A01:C23:6009:F000:1DD4:2864:CA3:54DE

More posts:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pre-Greek_substrate#Pseudo-Pre-Greek-Theory
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pre-Greek_substrate#Terminology
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Atlas_(mythology)#Correction
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Thrace#Etymology_2
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Iapetus#Pseudo-indo-european-Theory
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ausones#Pseudo-indoeuropean-Theory
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Zeus#Pseudo-indoeuropean-Theorie
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Iapygians#Etymology
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lady_of_Elche#Etymology
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Etruscan_language#Etruskians
• https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Talk:verto
• https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Reconstruction_talk:Proto-Italic/wert%C5%8D
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Teuta&diff=prev&oldid=1129232604