User:Tmtoulouse/CreationBot

{{#form: {{#input:type=hidden|name=content|id=blogContent}} {{#input:type=hidden|name=title|value=User:Tmtoulouse/CreationBotHistory}} {{#input:type=hidden|name=summary|id=blogSummary}} {{#input:type=hidden|name=caction|value=append}} {{#input:type=hidden|name=returnto|value=User:Tmtoulouse/CreationBot}}

Enter your supposed proof of evolution here: {{#input:type=textarea|rows=2|id=blogBody}}

{{#input:type=submit|value=Post comment|update=wgComments|onClick= var summary='Over 700 Ph.D. scientist have signed a petition saying they doubt Darwin. Your "facts" cannot compete with that.

';

document.getElementById('blogContent').setAttribute('value','\n \n'+document.getElementById('blogBody').value+'\n:'+summary+'\n'); document.getElementById('blogSummary').setAttribute('value','Another hapless victim');

}} }}

History

Your facts are easy to refute, the Institute for Creation Research has an article about that right now.

Your facts are easy to refute, Answers in Genesis has an article about that right now.

Your facts are easy to refute, the Institute for Creation Research has an article about that right now.

tmtoulouse looks like a moneky

Thats not support for Evolution thats just a fact. We have the same facts, we just have different interpretive frameworks for the facts. My interpretive framework shows me how that just supports creation.

meow

Your facts are easy to refute; the Institute for Creation Research has an article about that right now.