User talk:118.98.102.125
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Personal Information[edit]
It's considered bad taste to post personal information which the person themself didn't make freely available, especially when they're so neurotic about keeping themselves secret. EddyP Great King! Disaster! 17:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- He didn't dox him. What's the big deal? We already know he's from Buffalo and the rest was just speculation--User:Brxbrx/sig 17:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- The big deal is that our policy doesn't permit this kind of information to be posted here. That's it. No excuses because it doesn't meet Brxbrx's idea of what's a big enough deal for Brxbrx to do something about. "Doxing" isn't required. Real simple. Learn it. Live it.
18:16, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- I don't see his post as any different than other TWIGO:CP posts concerning ken. We've (I'm sorry, people that aren't me that I generally agree with and share certain traits with) made many such posts before, saying he's from Buffalo, saying he's probably suffering from some sort of mental illness, and that he's likely dependent on welfare or his family to live. "Policy" has not been invoked before, so why should it now? Particularly since there seems to be no harm. He hasn't been doxxed. --User:Brxbrx/sig 18:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Common sense - everyone here who cares to know knows of Ken of Buffalo (sik rhymz!), so there's no real harm in calling him Ken from Buffalo. Besides, these are things revealed in one way or another by past socks of his, such as 'kdbuffalo'. However, saying he lives at 7 Ken Street and has been suffering from such&such diseases for 18.78 years and moved from here to here then back to here in 1867 is too much. Speculation about Ken's mental state is just that: speculation, and made from info and evidence he made freely available - his utterly erratic editing and personality. The post that was made strayed far too much into his real life, and was very stalkerish. EddyP Great King! Disaster! 18:29, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- If you have personal infos just email them to me. Occasionaluse (talk) 18:31, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- He didn't post a street address. Just his (presumed) age and speculation as to his mental health and relationship with his family. You can call it creepy to make such in-depth speculation, but I don't see it as breaking policy.--User:Brxbrx/sig 18:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure what was posted wasn't mere speculation. EddyP Great King! Disaster! 19:40, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- I guess. On the other hand, we've no way of knowing. And anyways, if I were to say something like "Nutty Roux takes it up the ass from horses" and it turned out to be true, that doesn't mean I wasn't just speculating. Just an example.--User:Brxbrx/sig 20:40, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure what was posted wasn't mere speculation. EddyP Great King! Disaster! 19:40, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- He didn't post a street address. Just his (presumed) age and speculation as to his mental health and relationship with his family. You can call it creepy to make such in-depth speculation, but I don't see it as breaking policy.--User:Brxbrx/sig 18:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- If you have personal infos just email them to me. Occasionaluse (talk) 18:31, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- Common sense - everyone here who cares to know knows of Ken of Buffalo (sik rhymz!), so there's no real harm in calling him Ken from Buffalo. Besides, these are things revealed in one way or another by past socks of his, such as 'kdbuffalo'. However, saying he lives at 7 Ken Street and has been suffering from such&such diseases for 18.78 years and moved from here to here then back to here in 1867 is too much. Speculation about Ken's mental state is just that: speculation, and made from info and evidence he made freely available - his utterly erratic editing and personality. The post that was made strayed far too much into his real life, and was very stalkerish. EddyP Great King! Disaster! 18:29, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- I don't see his post as any different than other TWIGO:CP posts concerning ken. We've (I'm sorry, people that aren't me that I generally agree with and share certain traits with) made many such posts before, saying he's from Buffalo, saying he's probably suffering from some sort of mental illness, and that he's likely dependent on welfare or his family to live. "Policy" has not been invoked before, so why should it now? Particularly since there seems to be no harm. He hasn't been doxxed. --User:Brxbrx/sig 18:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
- The big deal is that our policy doesn't permit this kind of information to be posted here. That's it. No excuses because it doesn't meet Brxbrx's idea of what's a big enough deal for Brxbrx to do something about. "Doxing" isn't required. Real simple. Learn it. Live it.
|
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.
We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. |