User talk:138.247.97.94

Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, anonymous editor. This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

Please stop attempting to justify attraction to young teenagers in Pedophilia. You can rewrite the intro, but skip the pedantry about ephebophilia; the article already mentioned it. яεvεятεя σғ ωαη∂αℓιsм, ραтяσℓℓεя σғ ε∂ιтs, ΓУППЯ ・「ҭагк」・асђіεѵеϻԑηтѕ・тіме: 15:51, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

only pedophile apologists make the argument 138.247.97.94 is making. Should just ban this sick creep. Skeptical (talk) 15:56, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

I can't ban them yet, they technically haven't broken the rules, and I'd like to assume good faith. яεvεятεя σғ ωαη∂αℓιsм, ραтяσℓℓεя σғ ε∂ιтs, ΓУППЯ ・「ҭагк」・асђіεѵеϻԑηтѕ・тіме: 15:57, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

138 wrote to feel sexual attraction to pubescent's is "biologically natural rather than a disorder". So according to him/her, someone sexually attracted to a 13 or 14 year old is "natural". It isn't. And only a pedophile would make this sort of creepy misinformed statement. 138 is trying to normalise sexual attraction to kids.Skeptical (talk) 16:12, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

I don't think that's against the rules, although it's disgusting. Let me review them and I'll see if this warrants a block. яεvεятεя σғ ωαη∂αℓιsм, ραтяσℓℓεя σғ ε∂ιтs, ΓУППЯ ・「ҭагк」・асђіεѵеϻԑηтѕ・тіме: 17:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)