User talk:216.221.87.112

It was deleted because it's an idiot who has done the same many times before: next he changes the 1 to 2 (with a different IP) & so on - no I can't give chapter & verse. fröhlich ^{"gay" and "happy"} 04:23, 9 January 2009 (EST)

Is it important? It hardly counts as vandalism changing a number, let him go for it. - User $\scriptstyle h/2\hbar$ 04:31, 9 January 2009 (EST)

Not vandalism, it is how I test the vandal brake for IPs. tmtoulouse 12:13, 10 January 2009 (EST)

WP:Point

At least do your research before making an accusation. I support the inclusion of information like that. I removed it because I've been told again and again that it violates policy! Rpeh 18:49, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Which is exactly what WP:POINT is about. TK volunteered that information when interviewed for the article that he loves to reference because it calls us a vandal site, and it was also posted on Conservapedia (e.g. [1]) -- Nx / talk 19:08, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

See my response on the relevant page. Make your mind up one way or the other but stop blaming me because you can't manage it. Rpeh 19:09, 21 June 2009 (UTC)