User talk:96.30.183.189

Re: Citizendium

Please talkpage your additions on Sanger before making them. Thank you. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:42, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Not worth the effort. You censored things that have a clear source or which are instantly verifiable by a search. The article was not about Sanger but about Citizendium and its failures, and my edits simply proved that the same problems that killed Citizendium (according to the pre-existing version) also prompted Sanger's exit from Wikipedia. Since it cites his own words on his own talk page (after deletion of his account they remain attributed to an IP not Larry_Sanger but the page name is Talk:Larry_Sanger and no one disputes the attributions. If the source of Sanger himself is not good enough for you, it's hard to imagine what would be. ^{— Unsigned, by: 96.30.183.189 / talk / contribs}

I listed my concerns plainly here — no need for you to invent alternative narratives regarding why your sub-par edits were getting reverted. On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 12:43, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Frankly, linking to the talkpage is sufficient to see Sanger getting mad. Improper format, certainly, but not unsourced or wrong. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 12:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Incorrect, especially considering the BoN here admits that it's not even Sanger's account writing, but a random IP in an unspecified discussion. Aside from the fact that the edits weren't even formatted properly. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 12:49, 24 October 2016 (UTC)