User talk:Ajkeldsen/important notice to AKjeldsen

It should have been "sejrende". Ajkeldsen 20:15, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

I can't recommend that. "Jeg er sejrende", while gramatically correct, is a terribly clumsy expression. "Jeg er sejrrig" is much more aesthetically pleasing. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 20:19, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Jer lugt lige en gris. Ajkeldsen 20:21, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Burn! SHahB 20:23, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Ok, which shitty translator is it you're using? That should be "du lugter som et svin", or better yet, "stinker som et svin." --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 20:24, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Hvine lige en gris! Ajkeldsen 20:27, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Right. I think we should continue this discussion when you feel able to express yourself coherently. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 20:44, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Sure thing, uneducated extremist. Is English better for you? Habla Español? Ajkeldsen 20:46, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

I'd really prefer Anglo-Saxon. Biernath euw cwelan, solnan hundan! --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 20:48, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

I reject your pseudohistoric "proto-Dane" theories. Accept the fact that you came from wooden shoes. It doesn't make you any less of a man. It just means you descended from shoes, that's all. Ajkeldsen 20:50, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

It doesn't make you less of a man, it makes you more of a shoe! That's another classic, right there.^{— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs} 20:52, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Don't try to change the subject here! We're discussing your inept use of language, not your illusions about what I believe about proto-Danes. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 21:02, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

You changed the subject. You claimed to be a "Anglo-Saxon". I can't let such an obvious crackpot statement like that go unchallenged. Ajkeldsen 21:04, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

I'm impressed. Deficient in both understanding and usage. Please read that part of the "conversation" again until you understand it properly. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 21:19, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Andres, did you or did you not say "I'd really prefer Anglo-Saxon"? --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 21:22, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

I called you an uneducated extremist. You replied "I prefer Anglo-Saxon" (referring to the people group). Please explain to me what I misunderstood. 03:50, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

Well, you asked if English or Spanish would be better for me than that travesty you presume to call Danish. It should be obvious from the context that I was referring to the Anglo-Saxon language. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 04:35, 8 May 2008 (EDT)

You have previously made known your fringe views about these "proto-Danes". How was I supposed to know you were not reiterating your stupidity? --Ajkeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 11:30, 8 May 2008 (EDT)