User talk:Ajkeldsen
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
For when you will show up. (Editor at) CP:no intelligence allowed 05:40, 23 April 2008 (EDT)
Hi Bohdan! -- Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 14:53, 25 April 2008 (EDT)
Don't take this the wrong way[edit]
But I think you're a sockpuppet. You're one of the following:
- NightTrain
- Pinto's 4x4 Expressway
- Spica
- Stile4aly
- CPAdmin1
- Don't say anything. I will sense the answer through my oneness with nature.— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs 20:15, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Reply to my accusations you miscreant!— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs 20:49, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- I could be BobM. Ajkeldsen 20:51, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- I'm not seeing that, to be honest.— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs 20:53, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- RA? Ajkeldsen 20:54, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- OSIRIS?— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs 20:55, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- LBRIEUHDM. Ajkeldsen 20:56, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- You've lost me.— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs 20:57, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- He does have that effect on people. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 20:59, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- You can't fool me with your dry humour, "AKjeldsen"! I know I'm secretly your sockpuppet! Shabby said so.— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs 21:00, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Confound it! Well, in that case, I must inform you that it is a well established fact that I am a sockpuppet of User:Sid. I guess that makes you a... "sockpuppet squared"? --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 21:04, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- LOL! And what if I am Sid? Ajkeldsen 21:05, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Then we're made of wood, so we must be witches. Very simple, Shabby.— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs 21:07, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Ich denke es nicht, aber es ist wohl möglich. Verstehst du was ich schreibe hier? --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 21:10, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- No? Guess you're not Sid, then. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 05:26, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
- I refuse to lower myself to that level. Please do not use that sort of language on my talk page again. --AjkeldsenCum dissensie 11:32, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
- No? Guess you're not Sid, then. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 05:26, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
- LOL! And what if I am Sid? Ajkeldsen 21:05, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Confound it! Well, in that case, I must inform you that it is a well established fact that I am a sockpuppet of User:Sid. I guess that makes you a... "sockpuppet squared"? --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 21:04, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- You can't fool me with your dry humour, "AKjeldsen"! I know I'm secretly your sockpuppet! Shabby said so.— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs 21:00, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- He does have that effect on people. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 20:59, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- You've lost me.— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs 20:57, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- LBRIEUHDM. Ajkeldsen 20:56, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- OSIRIS?— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs 20:55, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- RA? Ajkeldsen 20:54, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- I'm not seeing that, to be honest.— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs 20:53, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- I could be BobM. Ajkeldsen 20:51, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Reply to my accusations you miscreant!— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs 20:49, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
Testing[edit]
perfect. --AjkeldsenCum dissensie 21:11, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Let me be the first to cry "deceit!"— Unsigned, by: 85.25.151.22 / talk / contribs 21:12, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- I'm pretty sure that impersonating a sysop is an actionable offense. At least, I haven't seen it mentioned anywhere that it isn't. Please cease and desist immediately. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 21:17, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Please, stop running around issuing threats. I already told you, being a descendent of wooden shoes does not make you less of a man. You don't need to do this. --AjkeldsenCum dissensie 21:21, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Sorry, I forgot to put the warning in a fancy sysop-colour: Please cease and desist immediately or suffer the consequences. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 21:23, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Is this better? --AjkeldsenCum dissensie 21:23, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Acceptable. Thank you for your cooperation, citizen. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 21:24, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- You're welcome, gentle authority. --AjkeldsenCum dissensie 21:25, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- "Gentle"? --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 05:27, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
- You handled a tricky situation with gentleness. I stand by my comments. --AjkeldsenCum dissensie 11:29, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
- "Gentle"? --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 05:27, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
- You're welcome, gentle authority. --AjkeldsenCum dissensie 21:25, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Acceptable. Thank you for your cooperation, citizen. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 21:24, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Is this better? --AjkeldsenCum dissensie 21:23, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Sorry, I forgot to put the warning in a fancy sysop-colour: Please cease and desist immediately or suffer the consequences. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 21:23, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- Please, stop running around issuing threats. I already told you, being a descendent of wooden shoes does not make you less of a man. You don't need to do this. --AjkeldsenCum dissensie 21:21, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- I'm pretty sure that impersonating a sysop is an actionable offense. At least, I haven't seen it mentioned anywhere that it isn't. Please cease and desist immediately. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 21:17, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
Annoying sock[edit]
Can I ban this sock on the grounds they have a deliberately confusing name? - User 06:50, 4 December 2008 (EST)