2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

User talk:Billybobcarterwashington

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

"Billybobcarterwashington", if empirically the promotion of relativity leads people away from the Bible, would you still support the promotion of relativity? I wasted time with your unsubstantial additions and you deny that liberals get a thrill out of deceit for its own sake alone, so anyone with an open mind can see that you're a supporter of infanticide. Furthermore, you are in denial that capitalizing Hell reduces insanity. As I've said before, liberals like to deny that deceit is a real problem that causes real harm, and it is correlated more with the liberal belief system than with conservative principles. If your approach is to rely on authoritative, time-tested sources, Anonymous User, then why haven't you been quoting the Bible during your many edits to this site? Go back to Wikipedia.--aschlafly 19:08, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Eat a bag of cocks.[edit]

New logo large.png Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, Billybobcarterwashington.

This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble.

We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives.

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you.

If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.