|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
User talk:Braiman
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Welcome! Thank you for your contributions. TmtamesP 19:48, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
- Or rather your massive deletions of our material. --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 19:51, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
- Massive deletion of garbage is appreciated. TmtamesP 19:52, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
- In that case, might I suggest doing a 'format c:' on the Conservapedia server? --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 19:57, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
- Sadly, it seems that I felt compelled to rollback all your illustrious contributions. It didn't help that the first one I looked at was you deleting virtually all of the article's content (Palestine). I gave you a brief 5 minute time-out, during which I hope you realize there are "talk" pages associated with all these article. PS, TmtamesP is our "resident vandal", so take his advice with a large grain of salt. human
20:00, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
- Sorry, but I don't understand the reason for obsessive rollbacks of my edits. I removed propaganda garbage and silly jokes that might be OK on Uncyclopedia, but I don't see how they belong here. I've also added some actual information to the Palestine article, but some people are still not pleased. Does it mean that this site is trying to emulate Uncyclopedia and neither objective information nor NPOV are welcome here?Braiman 12:04, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
- Judging by the subject matter of your edits you seem to have come here with an agenda. Now what you have to say may be perfectly valid but rather than making mass deletions of what is here I suggest you take it to the respective talk pages first.
Genghis Marauding 12:08, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
- We're not an encyclopedia, we're some kind of blog-and-grumpy-old-man hybrid. NightFlareSpeak, mortal 12:10, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
- Well, I came here because I liked the idea of this site and sympathized with its goal to expose the BS on CP. However, I'm also an Israeli and was interested to see what "rational" wiki had to say on the subjects related to my home country. Unfortunately, I found that the relevant articles were full of propaganda, misinformation and silly jokes, which somehow all were biased against Israel. Personally, I don't think that the situation in the Middle East is a laughing matter. People are actually dying here. I expected that the "rational" wiki would actually try to fight bias and promote reason and objectivity (in contrast to CP). This is the least we all can do to help reaching a just peace. Each time you put biased propaganda out, you add to perpetuation of this bloody conflict.Braiman 12:43, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
- Yes, Rationalwiki, fueling international conflict since '07. But seriously, if you have an issue with something, take it up on a talk page, it generally goes over much better. Pinto's5150 Talk 13:22, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
- I hope you are not prsdst, because this issue hits rather close to home for me.--
-PalMD --Take two aspirin and call someone else 13:29, 15 March 2008 (EDT) - In other words, this wiki is not really a wiki. It is a private project run by The Selected Few. Only The Selected Few can make changes. If a regular user wants to make a contribution, he/she has first to obtain a permission from The Selected Few on the talk pages. The only exception is if the said contribution is a silly joke inline with The Selected Few political worldview... Does not seem too different from Conservapedia, if you ask me.Braiman 13:42, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
- It's no different from any other collaborative project. Unilateral changes don't usually go over well.-- -PalMD --Take two aspirin and call someone else 13:43, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
- It's no different from any other collaborative project. Unilateral changes don't usually go over well.--
- I hope you are not prsdst, because this issue hits rather close to home for me.--
- Yes, Rationalwiki, fueling international conflict since '07. But seriously, if you have an issue with something, take it up on a talk page, it generally goes over much better. Pinto's5150 Talk 13:22, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
- Well, I came here because I liked the idea of this site and sympathized with its goal to expose the BS on CP. However, I'm also an Israeli and was interested to see what "rational" wiki had to say on the subjects related to my home country. Unfortunately, I found that the relevant articles were full of propaganda, misinformation and silly jokes, which somehow all were biased against Israel. Personally, I don't think that the situation in the Middle East is a laughing matter. People are actually dying here. I expected that the "rational" wiki would actually try to fight bias and promote reason and objectivity (in contrast to CP). This is the least we all can do to help reaching a just peace. Each time you put biased propaganda out, you add to perpetuation of this bloody conflict.Braiman 12:43, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
- We're not an encyclopedia, we're some kind of blog-and-grumpy-old-man hybrid. NightFlareSpeak, mortal 12:10, 15 March 2008 (EDT)
- Judging by the subject matter of your edits you seem to have come here with an agenda. Now what you have to say may be perfectly valid but rather than making mass deletions of what is here I suggest you take it to the respective talk pages first.
- Sadly, it seems that I felt compelled to rollback all your illustrious contributions. It didn't help that the first one I looked at was you deleting virtually all of the article's content (Palestine). I gave you a brief 5 minute time-out, during which I hope you realize there are "talk" pages associated with all these article. PS, TmtamesP is our "resident vandal", so take his advice with a large grain of salt. human
- In that case, might I suggest doing a 'format c:' on the Conservapedia server? --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 19:57, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
- Massive deletion of garbage is appreciated. TmtamesP 19:52, 14 March 2008 (EDT)
