There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User:Gulik/Flaws Essay
Has anyone read this? What is it? An article? An essay? If it's an article it's so badly written I can't fix it. If it's an essay it's impossible to respond to for the same reason. How do we request delete?--Bob_M (talk) 13:37, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- I think the writer was trying to do a spoof article. -Ĭ₠ŴΣĐĝё 13:39, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- At the very least, it should either be moved to the Essay namespace, or possibly something like User:Gulik/tripe or something. --Kels 13:40, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- Yes, please delete it. I wrote it somewhere on a talk page in lieu of an essay, but another contributor got a little carried away and attempted to turn it into an esssay. Heart♥Gold tx 13:41, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
I'm sorry, I see that this has been move to your namespace...if you wish my edits removed, could you throw them into the discussion space please? Thanks.DocSock 13:47, 25 May 2007 (CDT)
- In Heart's defense, it was rather late, and s/he DID say they were tired. I just felt the assertions being made deserved a little more notice than a discoussion page. Move this to "debate", where it cna get a proper hashing-over. maybe? --Gulik 16:32, 25 May 2007 (CDT)