User talk:Hamster/archive4
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Dead Asp.[edit]
Did you hear the news? The snake-guy is dead. :( . I don't think it's polite to kill animals, and I think my protests are bothering Philip. I just hope he doesn't go for cute rodents next. 
talk 19:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- what did the Atrocious one do to PJR ? I thought Ace was on a long involuntary vacation from aSoK ?
- He's working up to permanently blocking everyone who, in his self serving estimation both as participant and sheriff, has been uncivil to him, while denying that he himself makes really hateful unsupported accusations against his enemies in nearly every response.
20:18, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- It seems the statement, "It seems that you're obliquely referring to your self-serving 'civility' policy which you refuse to apply to yourself and under which you should have blocked your own self long ago," was deemed "insolence." Not even a cry to substantiate this time, just a permieblock. He's now asked me to substantiate something I didn't say. Which is equally fascinating and disturbing at the same time.
talk 20:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Can't see your svg. 21:21, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sadness. If it still doesn't work, I can look at it. It's like a 12-point path Bezier curves + 2 2 point path lines. talk 22:22, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Sadness. If it still doesn't work, I can look at it. It's like a 12-point path Bezier curves + 2 2 point path lines.
- he has to have driven off every christian and YEC to have Noone editing his site. He tries using a third person (referee) as though he isnt making the decision himself. He must hate the idea that the only people on his website is us. Hamster (talk) 21:55, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Bradley may be lurking and can chime in. He said on Asp's page IIRC that he stopped editing because of RWians. I'm glad to have fixed my own relationship with and to hear from him now and then. I think he also talks to another awful terrible no good uncivil RWian. So I'm not sure to what degree RWians are the only reason he stopped considering that and that he was never all that consistently active. But yes, Philip has made his site toxic to anyone he disagrees with. Or anyone at all. TK got it right when noted Philip's "clerk like pettiness". He's completely unlikeable — if a Christian ever wanted to feel welcomed by the site owner, it'll never happen at aSK. 22:09, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- I can go away if it can help (in the words of Samwise? I have no right being here (probably butchered), but really, he's got hypothetical administration out the wazhoo but policy is a little light. Having a functional block policy seems minimal. Those problems will not go away. There is a pattern of escalation on both sides, yes, but saying the editors you don't like have a depraved mind, suggesting that someone he doesn't like can't suggest rules, and going after me for an accusation I didn't make while using innuendo on another page about him are not helping him, certainly not in his case that he's not a bully. And it's silly to think I'm not going to respond. talk 22:22, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oh wow. I guess I didn't see all those posts. So it's a draft policy except it says it's a guide except Philip doesn't have to follow it except it has a spirit that coincidentally is explicitly described in the policy itself. Why can't he just admit he was wrong instead of this bullshit pedantry based on a bullshit claim. It's very clearly the rule if he followed of purported to follow it for Horace. Weirdo. 23:47, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oh wow. I guess I didn't see all those posts. So it's a draft policy except it says it's a guide except Philip doesn't have to follow it except it has a spirit that coincidentally is explicitly described in the policy itself. Why can't he just admit he was wrong instead of this bullshit pedantry based on a bullshit claim. It's very clearly the rule if he followed of purported to follow it for Horace. Weirdo.
- I can go away if it can help (in the words of Samwise? I have no right being here (probably butchered), but really, he's got hypothetical administration out the wazhoo but policy is a little light. Having a functional block policy seems minimal. Those problems will not go away. There is a pattern of escalation on both sides, yes, but saying the editors you don't like have a depraved mind, suggesting that someone he doesn't like can't suggest rules, and going after me for an accusation I didn't make while using innuendo on another page about him are not helping him, certainly not in his case that he's not a bully. And it's silly to think I'm not going to respond.
- Bradley may be lurking and can chime in. He said on Asp's page IIRC that he stopped editing because of RWians. I'm glad to have fixed my own relationship with and to hear from him now and then. I think he also talks to another awful terrible no good uncivil RWian. So I'm not sure to what degree RWians are the only reason he stopped considering that and that he was never all that consistently active. But yes, Philip has made his site toxic to anyone he disagrees with. Or anyone at all. TK got it right when noted Philip's "clerk like pettiness". He's completely unlikeable — if a Christian ever wanted to feel welcomed by the site owner, it'll never happen at aSK.
- Can't see your svg.
- It seems the statement, "It seems that you're obliquely referring to your self-serving 'civility' policy which you refuse to apply to yourself and under which you should have blocked your own self long ago," was deemed "insolence." Not even a cry to substantiate this time, just a permieblock. He's now asked me to substantiate something I didn't say. Which is equally fascinating and disturbing at the same time.
- He's working up to permanently blocking everyone who, in his self serving estimation both as participant and sheriff, has been uncivil to him, while denying that he himself makes really hateful unsupported accusations against his enemies in nearly every response.
- perhaps some Bible verses on goodwill to fellow man , turn the other cheek, forgive your enemies, modesty, throw the first stone and such. Does anyone think PJR could be shamed by his unchristian attitude Hamster (talk) 23:18, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Bald assertion. It's astonishing how supposedly rational people can accuse creationists of quote mining yet (deliberately? (That's how he thinks he's not calling you a liar)) cite these passages so far out of context that it's laughable. It just goes to show to what lengths atheists will go to smear Christians. You're resorting to misrepresenting the Bible because you have no argument. 23:47, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- But seriously. I've said it before. He's not a christian. He's a cultist who worships an extreme minorityy interpretation of the bible and perhaps himself to some degree. CMI is his church. YEC is his religion. 23:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- But seriously. I've said it before. He's not a christian. He's a cultist who worships an extreme minorityy interpretation of the bible and perhaps himself to some degree. CMI is his church. YEC is his religion.
- Bald assertion. It's astonishing how supposedly rational people can accuse creationists of quote mining yet (deliberately? (That's how he thinks he's not calling you a liar)) cite these passages so far out of context that it's laughable. It just goes to show to what lengths atheists will go to smear Christians. You're resorting to misrepresenting the Bible because you have no argument.
How's my favorite rodent?[edit]
Well? Sterile (talk) 02:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC) I am doing OK. Winter here so cold but very little snow. Nothing happening on aSoK so I have been doing other stuff. Hope you and the others are well and had a good holiday. Hamster (talk) 15:12, 6 February 2015 (UTC)