There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Human/sandbox4
Ug. - Icewedge 20:59, 4 September 2007 (CDT)
- Gee, thanks. Can you copy that to talk:main page so your vote of "nay" gets "counted"? humanbe in 21:04, 4 September 2007 (CDT)
- Try changing the color of the outline for the box on the right, the bright yellow is murder on the eyes. - Icewedge 21:31, 4 September 2007 (CDT)
I don't know. I kind of like it. But then again, I like oddball color combinations. (Oh shit... does that make me like my father?) --Wandalise me Bohdan! RA talk stalkOver 300 edits! 20:05, 22 December 2007 (EST)
Just for fun, you can try pairing opposite colors. That'll spice things up. --Wandalise me Bohdan! RA talk stalkOver 300 edits! 20:09, 22 December 2007 (EST)
- I don't know if you hit "reload", but all the colors are random. I wanted to make each header/section be the same hues, darker and lighter, but couldn't figure out how. Hence the headache inducing combinations in some places. But reloading over and over is a good way to find accidental combinations that actually work well. human
21:53, 22 December 2007 (EST)