User talk:Montecristo Dantes

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

What I just said — Unsigned, by: Montecristo Dantes / talk / contribs

Full response[edit]

[citation needed] Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 03:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

On a website which uses Cracked.com and TVTropes as sources? Yeah right. But here you go:

encyclopediadramatia.se/RationalWiki

--Montecristo Dantes (talk) 03:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

You think that's a better source than cracked or tvtropes? oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 03:35, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Rome Viharo[edit]

Viharo was banned for sockpuppetry and trolling at Wikipedia. Even if you want to dispute the latter, he was editing on multiple sock accounts which is an automatic ban.Krom (talk) 03:36, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

And that has what to do with "science"? lol, this just shows how far from the site's actual mission statement it's actually become, proving the points I've been making. It's now where bully boy admins pursue grudges from other sites, and promote extreme political views while harassing any newcomer who disagrees with them as if they "own" the articles despite breaking no rules. In the past I made a few contributions to the articles about actual pseudoscience and religious extremist groups but that's not what the site is really about anymore - just pushing radical left-wing agendas and giving individuals with Napoleon complexes a platform to bully people without repercussion. Short of issuing death threats I doubt there's any line an admin here couldn't cross that would land him more than a slap on the wrist. I'm here just to warn the few good men that the folks who "run" this site really don't care--Montecristo Dantes (talk) 03:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
And that has what to do with "science"? lol, this just shows how far from the site's actual mission statement it's actually become, proving the points I've been making. Nothing? And it doesn't has to, because it's related to media and cranks, which are missional.
It's now where bully boy admins pursue grudges from other sites [citation needed]
promote extreme political views [citation needed]
harassing any newcomer who disagrees with them as if they "own" the articles despite breaking no rules [citation needed]
Short of issuing death threats I doubt there's any line an admin here couldn't cross that would land him more than a slap on the wrist. Riiight. Have you ever read the Coop Archive?
I'm here just to warn the few good men that the folks who "run" this site really don't care Lol. Warn away, but feel free to use facts next time. Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 03:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Only agree with his statement on "radical left-wing agendas", this does unfortunately show on some pages, e.g. see the problem I had on the Black Lives Matter talk. There are "radical left" admins on this site who think "black people" cannot be racist. Look through my edits and you will see I disagree with this absurd position. I've covered black supremacist loons like Clyde Winters.Krom (talk) 04:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't see what you mean. Care to explain? <-𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈-> (talk) 04:08, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Krom, while I agree, this is tangential. FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 04:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
I don't see it all. He was just talking about BLM being racist and protesting deaths of criminals. <-𐌈FedoraTippingSkeptic𐌈-> (talk) 04:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Viharo sock[edit]

Montecristo Dantes is a Viharo sock, he's currently also writing garbage about Rationalwiki over at Encyclopedia Dramatica on the "Rationalwiki" entry there.Krom (talk) 23:34, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

[sic] oʇɐʇoԀʇɐϽʎzznℲ (talk/stalk) 02:00, 19 September 2015 (UTC)