User talk:NTemple

Hello person I have never spoken to before. How are you this fine day? Jammy 22:41, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Quite excellent, oh anonymous individual, and yourself? --NTemple 22:46, 11 January 2009 (EST) P.S. That Watson nutball you were posting about complained more (with a nice added dose of libel!) and got himself blocked for it!

Who decided to have amateur hour tonight? You guys are horrible. Worst socks ever. These kids today, I tell you. TheoryOfPractice 22:48, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Now that's not nice. Don't discourage us clueless kids.--NTemple 22:49, 11 January 2009 (EST)

you remind me of this...TheoryOfPractice 22:50, 11 January 2009 (EST)

You know, you aren't helping matters... my user page is... hmm... unsubtle. Thanks. I'm sure no one could have any idea what my CP account is...--NTemple 22:52, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Don't worry TK #wink# #wink# --Jammy 22:55, 11 January 2009 (EST)

Now that would be a twist.--NTemple 23:00, 11 January 2009 (EST)

It seems TK has no idea who you are, he's got you mixed up with someone else from Oxford that he blocked Jammy 12:19, 12 January 2009 (EST)

Oh, no- he got me (FIVE YEARS!!!! WOOO!!). But apparently his rage against Oxford is unstoppable.--NTemple 17:15, 12 January 2009 (EST)

Apologies...

I'm sorry. Really, I didn't mean to fuck with your shit (as Jules told Jimmie...) but it was just such a comedy of errors. I promise not to mess with you again...TheoryOfPractice 23:30, 11 January 2009 (EST)

No worries- I'm an amateur. Sometimes the best way to learn how to swim is to get thrown in the deep end. And yeah... I got all excited and violated even the basic rules for parody that even I knew. I'll set up a new sock on CP and start over. And nice Pulp Fiction ref. I love that movie. --NTemple 23:33, 11 January 2009 (EST)

WIGO

I rolled back your addition because it was already part of another WIGO lower on the page (and she was responding to THAT conversation, not the current one). --Irrational Atheist 16:56, 5 April 2009 (EDT)