User talk:NUTCASE71733

Welcome to RationalWiki, NUTCASE71733! Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards. If you are interested in contributing, please read what our articles are intended to be. Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

Hello and welcome to RationalWiki. I'm moving your post to a proper forum thread here. Ty^JFBANBSRADA 04:40, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Got your email. No problem. Ty^JFBANBSRADA 05:38, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

You have been vandal binned

This will limit your edit rate to one edit per half hour. The reason for this is you are clearly an MRA crack, and quite possibly a troll. This should help you think about the comments you post, and prevent you from spewing off bullshit and other MRA nonsense. Or you still can, but you won't be able to spew as much. –Aleksandr(a) Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 01:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Is he a vandal? No. Does he post much? No. Has he been insulting? No. He hasn't done much of anything, in fact most of the posts in that thread came from either me or AD. There's no good reason for this other than he holds a supremely unpopular opinion. That opinion just so happens to be widespread in the gaming community and I take pains to correct and debate it whenever I see it. Vandal binning my opposition is not going to help my case. I'm paroling until you can give me a more compelling reason. Nullahnung (talk) 01:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

WTF, Alyosha? If Nullahnung hadn't paroled our new friend, I would have. Nutcase, you are free to go about your business here; sorry about any inconvenience. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 01:40, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I'll follow that policy before vandal binning users. I can see why now Nutt Roux is calling this a debating site for cracks. I understand disagreement with Anita, but when someone comes in saying I'm not an MRA but... it's highly suspectable that they're a concern troll. –Aleksandr(a) Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 02:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Believe me, I considered that possibility that he was concern trolling. Then I looked at his edit history and he seems alright. Likes to discuss various issues not related to sexism as well and has kept rather agreeable up to this point. That's half the reason I am taking this discussion seriously in the first place. Plus he represents some serious views I have been faced with all over the place as a gamer, so he's not just some random crank. Nullahnung (talk) 03:00, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok, thats good. Good job on that. I might join the forum discussion then. I don't agree with Anita, and I realize that a lot of gamers don't but I still have suspicions as to why many of them don't. I wonder how of then they actually look to see if some of her claims are stupid first and how often they just go off that someone dared call video games sexist. To be fair to them, some of them may be tired with the endless series of cracks who claim that video games cause violence, economic failures, the defeat of the 2nd Reich in WWI, and that video game developers are secretly controlling the economy. –Aleksandr(a) Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 03:17, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Seriously?

Stop being irresponsible, Ehrenstein.--^talk 03:37, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Sasha, my comment was that RW is a chat site for cranks. You're one of them. Don't bring me into your persistent problems with site culture and rules. 14:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

I demoted you

Since Nullahnung seems to trust you and thinks you're legit and not a troll or MRA vandal, I think you might as well be demoted to sysop since it's standard practice for non vandal users. –Aleksandr(a) Ehrenstein, Jewish Bolshevik 23:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

I think at least a few constructive edits first are the norm, no? - GrantC (talk) 00:01, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes. Stop being so contrary, Inquisitor. Wèàšèìòìď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 09:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)