User talk:Nx/sandbox

Feedback

FYI, this looks fine in Firefox, but not IE. Explorer puts the time stamp on the next line down from the image/link, which means the time stamp is half obscured by the image. Wéáśéĺóíď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 19:33, 25 January 2009 (EST)

I know, IE doesn't support inline-block, but I don't know of another way to prevent the linebreak, and if I make it a span, the positioning doesn't work -- Nx ^talk 19:38, 25 January 2009 (EST)

Have you tried it with (eg)

<i style = "Blahblah;> xxxxx</i>

or similar? Love² 20:13, 25 January 2009 (EST)

I've tried span, but that doesn't work unfortunately. Currently, with the inline-block div, it looks perfectly in FF3 and Opera, it even get's underlined nicely. But alas IE doesn't support that. -- Nx ^talk 20:19, 25 January 2009 (EST)

"inline-block"? either inline or block surely [1] Love² 20:37, 25 January 2009 (EST)

Inline-block does exist -- Nx ^talk 20:44, 25 January 2009 (EST)

take it you've tried with inline on its own? Love² 20:51, 25 January 2009 (EST)

I'm trying that right now, but they don't align perfectly. -- Nx ^talk 20:57, 25 January 2009 (EST)

Spam

Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww. Is Nx playing in his sandbox? --"ConservapediaUndergroundThermistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 19:47, 25 January 2009 (EST)

Yes, he is trying to make it possible for the whole world to see your tasteful choice of fonts -- Nx ^talk 19:51, 25 January 2009 (EST)

Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww. How nice. Wait! What about your Java? But thanks for the help. I'd demote you further, but I can't, so instead, you have a free meal at my restaraunt. Go to my user page and place your order on the talk page. --"ConservapediaUndergroundThermistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 19:54, 25 January 2009 (EST)

Nx, have a goat. --"ConservapediaUndergroundThermistor^{is overworked and overbearing} 20:00, 25 January 2009 (EST)

Someone tell me what they're seeing on this page please.

It's 15:22 here -- Nx / talk 15:42, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

here _and marmite 15:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, but I was interested in the time on User:Nx/sandbox. -- Nx / talk 16:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Ah! this? _and marmite 16:04, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, that's it, thanks. And since you don't like it when I don't explain stuff: The values are different because caching is handled by an individual client's browser, not the server. I edited the page at 15:22, so that's what got cached in Firefox, but then I opened it in Opera a minute later, and it's still 15:23 there. You also opened it at 15:23. On Wikipedia, where caching is handled by the server, everyone would see 15:22. -- Nx / talk 16:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. I'm trying to follow what's going on, you know. _and marmite 16:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

I see BoN. -- 18:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC)