Bronze-level articleAbortion

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
One of many articles on

Abortion

Icon hanger.svg
Medically approved
In the back alley

Abortion, in a technical sense, is any expulsion of the embryo or fetus from the womb before it is able to survive independently. In most non-medical contexts it refers to a range of medical procedures[1] used to deliberately terminate a pregnancy. This article focuses on this debate about the legality of induced abortion, specifically within modern "Western" culture.

Whether and to what extent induced abortion should be encouraged, permitted, or discouraged is a social issue that has long divided theologians, philosophers, and legislators. In most parts of the world these issues continue to be debated, especially over what specific legal limits should be placed on abortion throughout the pregnancy, how late into a pregnancy induced abortions are legal, and what rights minors have to access abortions.

The debate about the legality of abortion generally divides into two camps. People who believe that abortion should be legal (sometimes with exceptions) are most often called "pro-choice", and are often called "anti-life" by their opposition. People who believe that abortion should be illegal (sometimes with exceptions) are most often called "pro-life", and are often called "anti-choice" by their opposition.

Contents

[edit] Overview

[edit] History

See the main article on this topic: History of abortion

It is likely that the desire to terminate a pregnancy has been around as long as women have understood the cause of pregnancy, basic anatomy, and basic herbalism. It is known that every culture studied has some form of abortifacient[2][3][4], or at least something they believed to be and accepted as an abortifacient. The first recorded cases of the use of abortifacient are from Egypt, 1500 BCE. Chinese writings from 700 BCE which contain lists of herbs that will end a pregnancy, as well as several references in Chinese folklore to centuries old practices both suggest the knowledge for ending pregnancies goes back 5000 years[4]. The Old Testament says abortion or killing of a child under 5 is less serious than murder. The father of the child or fetus should be compensated (not the mother). The compensation is higher if a boy is killed than if a girl is killed. [5] Aristotle, the Jewish Midrush, and 1st century Christian texts discuss the moral aspect regarding how far into a pregnancy it was acceptable to do abortions, and when not. The most common conclusion from antiquity (and one that is generally shared by most people today) found among "medical" people, theologians and legislators was that before there was appreciable movement, (40 days-3 months depending on the culture in question) abortion was considered to be an acceptable choice for women[3].

[edit] Procedure

There are two types of abortion performed by the medical establishment. "Medical" abortion, which is the administering of two drugs over several days to cause the uterus to expel the fetus, and surgical abortion which manually removes the fetus from the mother. Medical abortions must be done within 50 days of conception, obviously limiting its use to first term abortions. In the US, 17% of abortions are "medical".[6] In Europe and the UK, the percentage of medical abortions ranges from 50 to 75%.[7] Surgical abortions are the only method which can end a pregnancy in the second trimester or later, and include dilation and curettage, dilation and evacuation, and intact dilation and extraction (often referred to in U.S. politics by the emotionally-charged buzzword "partial-birth abortion") .

[edit] Legality and morality

See the main article on this topic: Morality of abortion
Map of abortion laws by country.
Mandatory pre-abortion counselling by state.

The morality and legality of abortion are hotly contested issues, certainly within the United States but also across many countries of the world.

Generally, debate will focus on when life starts, whether rape or incest or other complications justify abortion, and the competing interests of the woman and the baby.

[edit] Religious views

See the main article on this topic: Religion and abortion

[edit] Abrahamic religions

It is known that abortifacients [8] were known in the ancient Middle East[9] so it is likely they existed in ancient Israel. Yet neither the Torah, nor the Bible as it developed over history mentions the practice. Only through interpretation can any link be drawn.

'Pro-life' groups cite the numerous injunctions against murder in both the New[10] and Old[11] Testaments, and argue that this forbids abortion - after all, the foetus was not convicted in a fair trial (it is not judicial execution, which many pro-life conservatives support), and it is not an act of war (under which circumstances most Christians might accept killing), and thus it is murder. With the minimum age at which a foetus can survive outside its mother being pushed back further and further, in some cases past cut-off dates for abortion, such groups thus argue that foetuses are being aborted that could survive on their own (albeit with medical help) - to abort them, therefore, is murder, as mentioned above, and as Biblically prohibited. There is also a tenuous argument for distinct personhood before birth in Jeremiah 1:5 which states that 'before I formed you in the womb I chose you'; this is commonly interpreted by pro-life groups as implying separate existence before birth, but, given the context, is just as likely to refer to divine foreknowledge. (Though wouldn't "before I formed you" imply personhood before conception?)

An argument has developed, on the other hand, that the Bible attaches less 'personhood' to foetuses and very young children. Exodus 21:22, a mere ten verses after the above injunction against murder, states that, if a man hits a woman, causing a miscarriage or premature birth, but no serious injury, he should be subject to a court-mediated fine from the woman's husband. If this was the case, then the act of causing a miscarriage could not be construed as 'murder' (since compensation was not biblically allowed for murder[12]). This, while relying on a fair amount of extrapolation beyond the text itself, would seem to justify abortion, as it does not involve the taking of a human life. Furthermore, Numbers 5:11-31 seems to outline a priest-administered test for unfaithfulness, by administering an abortifacient 'bitter water' that would show if a woman had conceived (presumably out of wedlock).

There is also some precedent for divinely caused abortions: Hosea 9:11-16 (in which Hosea prays for God to cause Ephraim's women to miscarry), for example.

[edit] Unitarian Universalism

The Unitarian Universalist Church strongly supports abortion rights.

[edit] Buddhism

Buddhist views differ, but the Dalai Lama said that abortion should be viewed according to each situation.[13].

[edit] Wicca

Wiccans similarly have varying views on the issue, with no set precedent.

[edit] Pastafarianism

It seems that the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, known as Pastafarianism, takes no formal position.[14]

[edit] Secret ingedient

An unfounded fear common to anti-abortion and anti-vaccination "activists" is that aborted fetuses are used in vaccines. In short: They're not.

Furthermore, there are claims that food and soft drink companies (Pepsi is usually the target) are using aborted fetuses as ingredients. This scare led to a bill proposed in Oklahoma in 2012 to ban the use of aborted fetuses as ingredients in food products.[15] This is also false, of course. The claim comes from the fact that a company that produces additives, Senomyx, is experimenting with HEK 293[wp] cells, which were derived from an aborted fetus in the 1970s.[16]

Not caring about facts, Oklahoma State Senator, Ralph Shortey introduced a bill that would make it illegal to use aborted fetuses in "consumables"[17]. His stated facts rank right up there with some of the best researchers in the country. "I heard about it somewhere on the internet, that some companies were using aborted fetuses in food, and they had to be stopped".[18] He did clarify on the floor, that it was "more complex than that"[19], though his timing seems to suggest he didn't know the first article he found was a serious misrepresentation of the truth.

[edit] See also

[edit] Essays

Abortion is an important and emotional topic. Some of our RationalWikians have some things to say you might want to read. Note that they do not necessarily reflect the views of the community as a whole.

More abortion-related essays can be found here.

[edit] External links

[edit] Footnotes

Abortion articles on RationalWiki
Abortion - Fetus/Fœtus - Gonzales v. Carhart - Nuremberg Files - Pro-life - Pro-choice - Essay:Rhetorical analysis of abortion essays - Roe v. Wade - Schlafly, breast cancer and abortion - The Silent Scream - Barnett Slepian - Essay:Where do you fall in the abortion debate?
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Tools
support