Difference between revisions of "Talk:Metapedia"

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎What they say, redux: --> To Research Psychologist.)
Line 305: Line 305:
 
::::Be quiet, you. The grown-ups are talking. [[User:P-Foster|P-Foster]] ([[User talk:P-Foster|talk]]) 06:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 
::::Be quiet, you. The grown-ups are talking. [[User:P-Foster|P-Foster]] ([[User talk:P-Foster|talk]]) 06:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 
:::::Ha ha ha ha! I see you're pissed that a good suggestion came from me! [[User:Research psychologist|Research psychologist]] ([[User talk:Research psychologist|talk]]) 07:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 
:::::Ha ha ha ha! I see you're pissed that a good suggestion came from me! [[User:Research psychologist|Research psychologist]] ([[User talk:Research psychologist|talk]]) 07:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 +
:::::::Actually, I think it's a crap suggestion--obviously the "basic moderate stuff" is of little or no interest because we've already established it's copy pasta from WP. and it's really not much of an exposé when the site wears its ideology on its sleeve. no run off, willya, kid. [[User:P-Foster|P-Foster]] ([[User talk:P-Foster|talk]]) 07:33, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 
:::::Agree with the above.  We should have a few examples, with direct quotes, & none added to the article by Metapedia editors/supporters.  {{User:Weaseloid/sigred}} 06:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 
:::::Agree with the above.  We should have a few examples, with direct quotes, & none added to the article by Metapedia editors/supporters.  {{User:Weaseloid/sigred}} 06:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:33, 30 June 2010

do we really need to protect this? the wandalism is trivial and easily reverted... humanbe in 17:48, 3 October 2007 (EDT)

I only made it so IP's couldn't edit the page (I think) as the only one's that have so far are (presumably) the same person. Feel free to unlock it if you want however. Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 17:50, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
I guess I can live with that, but it is easy enough to keep an eye on stuff like this, and I'd rather err on the side of freedom than become sterile and incestuous like some certain other sites. -Smyth 17:52, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
Interesting. As far as I can tell, it's still protected, and yet JB was able to edit in his pet link. So your "no anons only" protections seems to have worked. humanbe in 19:22, 3 October 2007 (EDT)
I had never heard of Metapedia. I checked it out. I want to know how to unsee that without going all Budd Dwyer on myself. EVDebs 00:29, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
We apologize for the trauma. Perhaps you have a spiritual mentor, favorite restaurant, or some grain alcohol that will help you unsee it? I have been using all three in conjunction, and I am 3/4 healed now. humanbe in 01:34, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
I have a big-ass Jewish cookbook in front of me at the moment and I'm thinking of making bagels on Friday. Will that help? If not, I have a copy of The Joys of Yiddish and a pretty decent African diaspora cookbook that might help a little more. (BTW, is it true that there's a rule in the Atheist Handbook about using the blood of KKK children to make my artisanal ciabatta? I only upgraded from Agnostic a couple of months ago and haven't gotten my copy yet.) EVDebs 02:39, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
Sorry, I had to bite on this: "big-ass Jewish" Sorry, really sorry. I didn't mean it. I loves me the Jews, and hopes them to find a happy home... humanbe in 03:56, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
Fat-bottomed maidels, they make this kosher world go oy!

I tried to make bagels once, they're really tough. My attempt turned out...sub-optimal. Better luck with yours. --Kels 06:13, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

I just wanted to interrupt here and say I did in fact make some artisanal ciabatta the other night. No blood of Aryan children, but a nice starter with an Oregon Trail pedigree. The dough was quite evil though -- soft and tenaciously sticky. EVDebs 01:54, 18 December 2007 (EST)

Question

What did Metapedia ever do to you? None of you are banned as you are at Conservapedia, and I see no reason to hate thim. Freedomforthewhiteman 14:20, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

They came into existence. --Edgerunner76 14:35, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
Spreading hate, lies, and stupidity is bad for everyone in the long run. So can I offer you a knish? Maybe a mess of collard greens or some chicken mole? EVDebs 14:45, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
I could go for some homemade macaroni and cheese. Mmm, macaroni and cheese. --Edgerunner76 14:48, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
Oh, man. Macaroni and cheese, mmm...wonder if I should make that tonight. --Kels 14:52, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
Oh yeah, I think that is dinner for me tonight. --Edgerunner76 14:56, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
Yeah, but mac and cheese won't offend racist jerkwads... EVDebs 15:02, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
To hell with that guy! This isn't even about him anymore. I just want some damn mac and cheese! --Edgerunner76 15:05, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
I had bagels and cream cheese this morning, does that count? --Kels 15:19, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

It's not like we're doing much of anything to them. Anyone doing stuff over there is doing it on their own hook, not on behalf of RW, and the worst we're doing is describing them accurately. Pretty mild. --Kels 14:37, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

Man, now I wanna go to that awesome Ethiopian restaurant downtown, but I got nobody to go with. --Kels 15:20, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

What has Metapedia done to me? Clogged up the tubes with its evil. Also, they have banned me. Forty-three times, as a matter of fact. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
Maybe they banned you, but you were probably vandalizing. Unlie at Conservapedia, where you were banned arbitrarily. 4.152.24.25 21:51, 4 October 2007 (EDT)
Wait, Wikinterpreter, you actually created an account there? Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 00:14, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
I did, too, and I thought it was a pro-project username, and made some pro-project edits, but by the time Gunther and his goons got a chance to check them out, I got busted, banned, and labelled as an "obvious troll". Stupid white men... humanbe in 02:04, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
Yep, Pinto, I'm pretty much all of the 'vandals' on wheels. And no, Jeb, I wasn't vandalising - they should appreciate having MLK's 'I have a dream' speech copied in font size 5 Impact blue bold onto every single page. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
If Human was "Furze" I think he deserved it. Unlike all the good Nazi heroes who have been banned from CP. 4.152.6.184 16:05, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
Wrong guess. And, hey, wikinterp, how come we don't have that glorious MLK speech page here? humanbe in 16:24, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

deletion

I'm not sure why SusanG deleted this article, so I restored it. humanbe in 15:50, 4 October 2007 (EDT)


'Twasn't accidental - jeb was getting on my nerves! It stopped him. Only intended it for temporary deletion. Anyway nice to see it back.Susantalk to me 16:07, 4 October 2007 (EDT)

Delete this articel

Useless, worthless, bigoted and stupid. Has nothing to do with the site's mission. 4.152.30.167 21:17, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Nise speling job, dood. Impressive. Actually, it's accurate, clear, concise, and absolutely is on track with our mission. Dumbass. humanbe in 21:27, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
This article is a stupid attack page that should be deleted. If you don't delete, I will begin to replace mass numbers of RW articles with A. Wyatt Mann cartoons. Racemixingisgenocide 21:29, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
This article is an honest, accurate depiction of the site concerned, based on visiting it and reading it. Whoa, threats? OMGZ I AM SO SCARED!!!!!11111oneone@!21!@@!! And guess what, dumbass? We won't even block your sorry loser self! humanbe in 21:39, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

If this article was meant to be funny...

...then it's not. If it was meant to be serious, it's just stupid. Anyway, I go with deleting it. Southernpovertylawcenterisforfaggotsitdeservestodie 10:18, 6 October 2007 (EDT)

Ah, but we don't care what you think Jeb. Susantalk to me 10:31, 6 October 2007 (EDT)
You know, we need a new name which describes in an RW way a certain type of person. "Troll" really isn't it. How about "Mouth Foamer"? The initials are incidental.--Bob's your uncle 11:17, 6 October 2007 (EDT)
How about infantile twat? Susantalk to me 11:24, 6 October 2007 (EDT)
WOMAN!! 4.152.33.111 13:11, 6 October 2007 (EDT)
'Troll' can be good or bad - it just refers to a specific set of tactics in the Internet Warrior's arsenal (should be an article ...). How about 'subHuman ice sock gang'? -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!

Well, as the real Jeb, not some sock, I say the article is perfectly fine the way it is. It shouldn't be changed, at all. All of those socks are probably just Human being silly. So that's it, and this is definitely Jeb, not someone who he gave his account password to.--Jeb Berkeley 13:33, 6 October 2007 (EDT)

I think that if he wants to be a racist southern fag, let him. You are just encouraging him with all this talk. and how about instead of troll we use southern fag.The AlienDon't tase me, Bro!!! 14:01, 6 October 2007 (EDT)

For a start, I propose a moratorium on the non-snarky use of the word 'fag'. We're better than that. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
True, lets not be homophobic, how about "southern-whore"? - Icewedge 14:15, 6 October 2007 (EDT)
Meh, whore=prostitute=fault of customers, not practitioners, so that's a bit degrading. We could take a Thomist view - 'and he is that which all men call Jeb'. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
So Troll -> Jebbist? Susantalk to me 14:57, 6 October 2007 (EDT)

I've always been partial to Cletus, the Slack-Jawed Yokel, but it's tough to beat a classic. --Kels 15:04, 6 October 2007 (EDT)

I'm still stuck on "mouth foamer". I mean - foaming at the mouth is what these people do.--Bob's your uncle 15:38, 6 October 2007 (EDT)
Yeah, except "foamer" already refers to hardcore railfans -- too rich to be hobos, too messed-up to actually work for a rail company. EVDebs 14:29, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

Teh feeding of teh parodic troll

Don't do it. --Linus(plot evil tech) 09:27, 7 October 2007 (EDT)

I agree with linus, it just encourages them to continue to posting the link, it gives their sad pathetic little lives meaning. I mean just because we have a link doesn't mean we support it. All it does is to bring more racist members on to the site.The AlienDon't tase me, Bro!!! 22:25, 13 October 2007 (EDT)

Anti-white nonsense picture

This page was bad enogh already, but the picture is an obvious attack on white people. It should be removed. Apartheid 21:17, 19 October 2007 (EDT)

The site which this article is based upon is an obvious attack on all non-white people, you remove the site from existence, I'll take down the picture. Deal? Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 21:20, 19 October 2007 (EDT)
I can't remove the site from existence, since I'm not the founder. You CAN remove the stupid anti-white picture. Apartheid 21:24, 19 October 2007 (EDT)
As an almost 100% white person, I don't see how the picture is anti-white. Silly, yes, weird, granted, but anti-white?? (Unless that "Be A Better Person" nasal spray is supposed to be poison??) If anything, the picture of the black person was so close to a stereotype that my initial thought (before really looking at it) was that it was probably an anti-black picture. Researcher 21:57, 19 October 2007 (EDT)
Apartheid, that's what we call humour, not racism. If you're offended by that, you're probably the sort of person who thinks Cecil Rhodes was an okay kind of guy. What the hell are you jackboots doing here anyway? Shouldn't you be out lying about Jewish people with better educations than you or something? EVDebs 00:37, 20 October 2007 (EDT)\

Attacks

What's with the attacks against the wiki? It should stop. I request this hater page be deleted. 4.152.6.37 19:15, 21 October 2007 (EDT)

What attacks?--Remarcsd 19:20, 21 October 2007 (EDT)
"If they stop lying about us, we'll stop telling the truth about them." -- Adlai Stevenson. --Gulik 19:57, 21 October 2007 (EDT)
Ahhh, those attacks.--Remarcsd 20:19, 21 October 2007 (EDT)

AH article screen shot

I don't think that image does anything one way or another, on the article or on our site. See my comments at [[Image_talk:Metahitler.PNG]]. It's unreadable, and having an article with text doesn't prove anything one way or another - the WP article on Hitler is longer than theirs, does that mean WP loves him even more? Requesting discussion before removal and deletion... humanUser talk:Human 18:25, 24 October 2007 (EDT)

What They Say

I've put a few choice quote in the article so that people can have some idea of where they are coming from. But I'm not entirely happy about even having these things as quotes on the site. What do we think? --Bobbing for apples 07:49, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

Ignoring it won't make it go away, so... better get it out in the open and deal critically with it, I think. --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 10:46, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

I agree with AK- the more lights that are on, the more the roaches are forced back into their holes. PFoster 10:51, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

I¡ll put some links in then. Might stimulate some contra-arguments as well.--Bobbing for apples 11:02, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

racialism

I see that we've got a (sic) (and a sickening) after this word, It does, in fact, exist as a word - which was a surprise to me. So the sickening comment may be correct - but the (sic) isn't.--Bobbing for apples 13:20, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

Well, the sic is still "correct" - just unnecessary. humanUser talk:Human 14:16, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

Black Panther

Technically, most, if not all of that was accurate. Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 23:18, 25 October 2007 (EDT)


Accurate - like the part where BP took out the Holocaust Denial tag? PFoster 23:20, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

I added the Holocaust denial tag. YOU took it out. Black Panther 23:21, 25 October 2007 (EDT)
Check the history, it's true. Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 23:22, 25 October 2007 (EDT)
My Bad, sorry. PFoster 23:23, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

Watchdog article requested

[[What is going on at MP?]] - or something similar. Black Panther 23:27, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

I vote against this, as it gives un-needed attention, and links to MP. Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 23:30, 25 October 2007 (EDT)
But if it becomes popular enough, it may become the highest Google result. Black Panther 23:32, 25 October 2007 (EDT)
True, but I personally feel that they vandalize this site enough as it is, however, this is for the community to decide, and not me. Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 23:35, 25 October 2007 (EDT)
Personally, while I can laugh at CP, I don't have the stomach to try to look at MW enough to know what's going on there. Researcher 23:38, 25 October 2007 (EDT)
Sorry, I;ve already started the article. Black Panther 23:41, 25 October 2007 (EDT)
But it didn't make the link blue, so I nowiki'd it for now. humanUser talk:Human 01:46, 26 October 2007 (EDT)

"But if it becomes popular enough, it may become the highest Google result." Okay, Ken PFoster 23:41, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

I have nothing against the idea--but I will do nothing to help with it. I've tried to see what drives the people there multiple times, but I come away with nothing but a real need to vomit every time I try. Researcher 23:55, 25 October 2007 (EDT)

I don't like the idea. Conservapedians tend to be the harmless kind of nuts, so ridicule is appropriate. Metapedia seems to be populated with the dangerous kind of fruit cake, to whom the proper response is psychiatric evaluation followed by medication and/or a lengthy stay in a secure unit. --Jeeves 00:08, 26 October 2007 (EDT)

Attack on Rationalwiki

In response to your pathetic attempts to vandalize the site with liberal bullshit, MP users are coordinating attacks on RationalWiki. At around 15:59 UTC tomorrow, we will begin creating constant vandalbots replacing pages with links to the site and replacing RW articles with MP ones. Knotsey 18:53, 12 November 2007 (EST)

How appropriate. You fight like a cow.
...
No, wait. That's not right... --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 19:00, 12 November 2007 (EST)
Oh man that made my day.....the best game eva!11!!1 tmtoulouse pester 19:07, 12 November 2007 (EST)
Heh, what a terrifying threat. Locke User is Vandal/sysop Always Watching...... 19:12, 12 November 2007 (EST)
When is 15:59 UTC in EST? I want to get some popcorn and a ringside seat! humanUser talk:Human 19:27, 12 November 2007 (EST)
EST is -5 UTC. So 10:59 EST. tmtoulouse pester 19:30, 12 November 2007 (EST)
Dang, I probably won't be up yet. Can someone tape it for me? humanUser talk:Human 19:31, 12 November 2007 (EST)
Get your ass out of bed, you souse!!--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 19:41, 12 November 2007 (EST)

Bah, I'll be at work. So my blue-eyed, pale-skinned, German derived (on my dad's side) self won't get the full glory. --Kels 20:04, 12 November 2007 (EST)

Presumably, however, MediaWiki offers a feature to lock down and snapshot the entire database in case these bozos make good on the threat? It does, right? EVDebs 01:53, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Oh sure, but its easy to handle I think with a few editors and roll back. I am also working on a software solution that should limit the damage of vandals but should not effect normal use at all. tmtoulouse pester 01:59, 13 November 2007 (EST)
(yawn) has anybody here ever vandalized MP? --Ζωροάστρης 02:03, 13 November 2007 (EST)
I've never even looked at MP, honestly. My time is generally spent looking at stuff I like, instead. --Kels 06:50, 13 November 2007 (EST)

That was easy! Elassint Throw things at me

Wow, my first sysop duties, and I thwarted a mayjer attakkk. How 'xciting! VirileSterileyawn! 11:08, 13 November 2007 (EST)

He was tricky, though registering as SteriIe to be confused with Sterile. VirileSterileyawn! 11:18, 13 November 2007 (EST)

  • What happened? Where were the constant vandalbots? We were promised vandalbots! Let me talk to the manager! I want a refund! Master Bra'tacKree! 20:02, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Registered

Well, I've done it - I've registered at Metapedia (GASP!). I'm not sure where it will go, and I have no expectations - feel free to watch my journey play out. --Ζωροάστρης 02:18, 13 November 2007 (EST)

I have an account there, and its not dead yet <GASP> Elassint Throw things at me 03:08, 13 November 2007 (EST)
Personally I'd rather vomit my entrails than look at that site again, but goatspeed to you guys! Totnesmartin 05:47, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Well - I fixed some stuff in their Canada and Pierre Trudeau articles, and I mentioned that Jesus was a, you know....Jew in a couple of places. I also cut and paste CP's Homosexuality article into theirs, but it somehow felt wrong, so I took it out. We'll see how long all that lasts. I feel like I need a shower just from spending a half-hour there. Won't be going back, I think...PFoster 19:28, 13 November 2007 (EST)

I created about 5 accounts along the lines of "••••••••" to spread about some lovely vandalism, but, sadly, they require manual administrative authentication. --Linus(plot evil tech) 23:57, 14 November 2007 (EST)

Why cant I just put an external link there?

Is it that bad? I've never been there before. 209.17.190.78

Because, as our smart, wise and very good looking sysops said: "RationalWiki does not provide links to racist garbage."PFoster 19:32, 13 November 2007 (EST)

Attack on this site

What is with the attack on this site? Those of you who are banned from here are banned for wandalism, not for ideology. Prussian1488 16:57, 28 November 2007 (EST)

HACKERS ON STEROIDS. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!
Because racist garbage is irrational garbage. Beyond that, racism is one of the most destructive forms of irrationality on the web. Researcher 17:45, 28 November 2007 (EST)
We aren't hatin' on youze because "we" were banned - we'ze hatin' on ya for your message, ideas, and content. humanUser talk:Human 19:35, 28 November 2007 (EST)

cripple-dicked neo-Nazi bedwetters

I see that this (and other insults) is included in the introduction. I note that one of our community standards is Personal "attacks", however justified, are strongly frowned upon. I can't help but feel that this may just fall under the description of "personal attack". I must say that I also personally find this kind of hyperbole rather detracts from the point being made. Any thoughts? --Bobbing up 14:33, 4 December 2007 (EST)

though it pains me to say it, I sortof agree. It might be better to let their own message make themselves look bad without the aid of pointless insults. ♠ ŖєuĻєəux ♠say wнäτ? 14:48, 4 December 2007 (EST)
I agree. "Neo-Nazi" on its own is enough of an insult, and backed up by the facts on the ground. humanUser talk:Human 14:57, 4 December 2007 (EST)

Archive

Why are our Neo_N friends so obsessed about archiving this page?--Bobbing up 15:00, 12 December 2007 (EST)

I'm trying to figure that one out too. --Edgerunner76 15:10, 12 December 2007 (EST)
Maybe it's got something to do with Mr 4.152.?.? above? CЯacke® 15:21, 12 December 2007 (EST)

Sorry for deleting

Clicked the wrong button...-αmεσ (ninja) 01:19, 18 December 2007 (EST)

Since the Prussian Blue article is deleted...

...why not delete this one too? Jeb BerkeIey 11:18, 19 December 2007 (EST)

Is that a request? CЯacke®
Larry Craig. Jeb BerkeIey 11:31, 19 December 2007 (EST)
So, how much meth do you have to smoke before all communication attempts are rendered moot? CЯacke®
ATLASIA. Jeb BerkeIey 11:40, 19 December 2007 (EST)
Prussian Blue was deleted due to the fact that no one really cares about them any more. Researcher 15:40, 19 December 2007 (EST)
I hope that's true, Researcher.... man can dream :-(-αmεσ (ninja) 15:42, 19 December 2007 (EST)
Ames thats the second time in as many days you have used that phrase. You are certianly a dreamer, aren't you? Bohdan 15:59, 19 December 2007 (EST)

I still want to be on record saying that someday, those two featherwood larvae are going to need some chiffarobe busting done. The repressed ones always want what they claim to hate the most. EVDebs 15:53, 19 December 2007 (EST)

What the heck is the etymology of "featherwood", anyway? It's sounds like an insult to a man who . . . can't perform. Researcher 15:55, 19 December 2007 (EST)
In need of VIAGRA, Researcher? Well, for just your real name, Social Security number, and bank PIN, a FREE thirty-day supply can be YOURS! --That guy who spams your email 16:06, 19 December 2007 (EST)
I've no idea where it came from. I just know that as far as taking insulting terms and using them yourself, that has got to be one of the most demeaning self-identifications ever, as it plays up the perceived insignificance of femininity along with the stupidity of racism. EVDebs 00:16, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Banning lynx is Conservapedia style and retarded

Censoring links (or should i say: lynx) to this site is similar to the censoring of godhatesfags links on CP. Are you just like them, only liberal? Straha 10:48, 27 December 2007 (EST)

No we're cooler. And far sexier. And we have goats and long-eared jerboas! PFoster 12:28, 27 December 2007 (EST)

No, as PFoster says, we're awesome. We also tell you how to find Metapedia, so it's not as if we're censoring you. -- מְתֻרְגְּמָן וִיקִי שְׁלֹום!

Sir, I must object. We have never banned any lynxes here. At most a few long-eared jerboas, but they were really asking for it. --AKjeldsenGodspeed! 14:24, 27 December 2007 (EST)

heh

how am i doing? XD New Gwenson New Gwenson New Gwenson New Gwenson 22:08, 2 January 2008 (EST)

not very well. humanUser talk:Human 22:51, 2 January 2008 (EST)

Ed Poor...

Unless someone can show documented evidence of Ed's normally benign racism reaching the depths of Holocaust denial, then I really think it's unfair to put his name in the article...PFoster 15:58, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

Hear! Hear! Don't like personal name calling. SusanG 16:11, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
Can we add it Schlafly style (i.e. saying its "probably" true) like we do with the other stuff? NightFlareSpeak, mortal 16:25, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
I think it's a bit too nasty to accuse someone without concrete evidence. SusanG 16:29, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
I prefer the term "undisproved statement". NightFlareSpeak, mortal 16:51, 8 April 2008 (EDT)
:-) SusanG 16:54, 8 April 2008 (EDT)

IQ note deletion

I think a note on how IQ is actually measured might be reasonable (that's why I put one in!). We all know, but the laypeople may not, and if we expect them to come here for ensmartening, we have to make it easy, and maybe have a bowl of chex mix in the waiting room, y'dig? Wazza 01:26, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Tired old joke

I'm sure this is a tired old story, but:

From Homosexuality: Pedophiles suffer from a similar disease... But I thought the Pope denounced same-sex marriage! :) Lyra (Allow me to lend a machete to your intellectual thicket) 23:50, 17 May 2008 (EDT)

I don't get it. 97.42.55.246 00:04, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
Sign, damn you, sign! <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!Doors in the rudders of big ships 23:57, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
You know, Elassint, I still know it's you whether or not you sign, I hope you aren't just being difficult/snobby... And now:
  1. The Pope heads the Catholic Church
  2. Ever since The Inquisition Catholics have been involved in pedophilia, don't you remember, when the Pope was here (in the US) he said "...the pedophilia scandals were badly handled". Lyra (Allow me to lend a machete to your intellectual thicket) 00:03, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
LOL. now i get it. 97.42.55.246 00:05, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

BON's claim

it's a really good thing I'm having a shower soon, that's all I'm saying. But I couldn't find any direct quotes currently on the site. I did see a pictorial claim that Britney Spears > Asians, which shows just how sick these people are. Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)Approach the Presence 09:32, 26 November 2008 (EST)

I refuse to check the claim myself. And, since it came from a Bo'N, I believe that the burden of proof lies with them. --Edgerunner76Your views are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter 09:37, 26 November 2008 (EST)
Is metapedia even active or complete enough to make that fact significant? They probably don't have much to say on a lot of things, purely because it's hardly the 2 million article strong Wikipedia that they're copying. Scarlet A.pngmoral 08:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
You'll note it's been 8 months since we noticed them. No, they ain't active. They is stoolidge. ħumanUser talk:Human 08:38, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I had a look. They don't have an article on Asians, but they do have one on Mongoloids. Anybody want a quote or two? - π 09:15, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Okay, let's have some. I haven't had a good *head-desk* for a couple of days. Scarlet A.pngmoral 09:23, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Well we have:
German anthropologist Christoph Meiners characterized Caucasians as having "lightness" and "beauty" with the "whitest, most blooming and most delicate skin". On the other hand, he characterized Mongolians as being "weak in body and spirit, bad, and lacking virtue."

or:

Asian Mongoloid are probably the most intelligent race on the world, with average IQ between 105 and 110 (for comparison, European whites have 100). This high level of intelligence led to the great development of the Japanese society which is today one of the largest economic world powers. Asian Mongoloid are in fact the only non-white people who was able to attain economic and life standards comparable to those of Europe and the United States, with the notable exception of China, which has been repressed by its Communist regime for many years.
- π 09:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Wow, they almost managed to properly compliment another race there. Scarlet A.pngmoral 09:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Wow

They really are neo-nazis.... BigGuy (talk) 00:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


Hope for Conservapedia

As much as i dislike Andy Schlafly and his group of bigots at conservapedia, at least they recognize this site as what it is. Myabe there is some hope for conservapedia after all :/ always try to find the good in people folks!--BenB (talk) 04:03, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

"U can has creepy"?

So who's the redhead? - David Gerard (talk) 23:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

I believe it was found on one of the right-wing nutter forums. I find her oddly compelling but the white supremacist stuff is a bit of a turn-off. --ConcernedResident Wii for the ladies 17:20, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Research psychologist's edits

A lot of the things he is adding to this article he either added to Metapedia or his actions caused them to be added, either way he is essentially using this article to spread the "hate speech" he was spreading there. I don't think he should be allowed to add to the quotes section as we don't really want this to be a proxy for him to spread racist views. - π 07:06, 26 June 2010 (UTC)


HA HA HA! You just made a reckless mistake, Pi. Your anger is making you unstable. I love how you try to put a polished covering over it with your wording (e.g. "proxy for him to spread racist views"); it's just so comically pathetic! Anyone can look at the edit histories of all of the metapedia articles in question and see that Pi is a liar; I didn't add any of those ridiculous things to metapedia. What's next Pi- having made such a deliberate deception against me, are you next going to try to assassinate me? Both actions are acts of great anger and deliberate focus. Research psychologist (talk) 07:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

I am not angry, what gave you that impression I am? You did add that stuff about east-Asian only being good at torturing people, I had a look. - π 07:35, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Actually that was Hu1. However, I still think there is way too much of this crap and I don't want to turn this page into a outlet of this kind of material. - π 07:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
???... Come on, that stuff that I pointed out on metapedia is ridiculous. Who are you afraid is going to believe that crap who doesn't believe it already? An escaped mental patient? ...Besides, if you don't want the page to be used as an outlet for racists, then there are some more believable statements that you should be removing. Research psychologist (talk) 07:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Whatever. I would like to hear someone besides yours or my opinion on the matter. - π 08:01, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Looking through the edits some of that stuff was pretty unbelievable.--BobSpring is sprung! 08:07, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Thoughts on how little or how much to include? - π 08:16, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
The changes are here. No point in including the Wikipedia or V for Vendetta comments since they relate to stuff on talk pages or buried in edit histories rather than in articles. Kitler is a deleted article. Few of these are direct quotes, & they're not really adding much to the article. WëäŝëïöïďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 08:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

What they say, redux

Section is a bit of a mess, with some direct quotes mixed in with our "takes" on what MP says. Can we pick one approach--I prefer the former, let 'em hang themselves with their own entrails--and be consistent? P-Foster (talk) 05:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Indeed. I will revert RPs edits on sight, however. It has failed the test of endless edits that sucked eel soup. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
I prefer direct quotes with quotation marks, referenced with screenshots if possible. I also think we only need a half dozen or so, enough to get the point across that they are racist bigots, without this becoming a site mirror. Lets be honest what isn't copied straight from Wikipedia is stupid, we don't need to copy it all to show that. - π 05:58, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
I agree with the irrational one. ħumanUser talk:Human 06:29, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
I say we leave in only the wackiest quotes, and take out the more basic moderate stuff that one would expect. That way, it's more of an exposé. Research psychologist (talk) 06:19, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Be quiet, you. The grown-ups are talking. P-Foster (talk) 06:38, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Ha ha ha ha! I see you're pissed that a good suggestion came from me! Research psychologist (talk) 07:26, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Actually, I think it's a crap suggestion--obviously the "basic moderate stuff" is of little or no interest because we've already established it's copy pasta from WP. and it's really not much of an exposé when the site wears its ideology on its sleeve. no run off, willya, kid. P-Foster (talk) 07:33, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Agree with the above. We should have a few examples, with direct quotes, & none added to the article by Metapedia editors/supporters. WëäŝëïöïďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 06:52, 30 June 2010 (UTC)