2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Category talk:Apologists and counter-apologists

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I think AntiCitizenX should be included in the counter- apologists section as he has uploaded numerous spectacular videos debunking Christian apologists on his Youtube channel.— Unsigned, by: IlluminatiAgent / talk / contribs

Then add him. FᴜᴢᴢʏCᴀᴛPᴏᴛᴀᴛᴏ, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 05:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Wanted to mention a Christian apologist and atheist counter-apologist argument over the historical reliability of the New Testament, especially concerning the bodily resurrection of Jesus. This features notable scholars Dr. Bart Ehrman (UNC-Chapel Hill) vs. Dr. Mike Licona (Houston Baptist University) at TheBestSchools.org: http://www.thebestschools.org/special/ehrman-licona-dialogue-reliability-new-testament/

— Unsigned, by: Dan lineage / talk / contribs