Category talk:Bad sources

Explain closer plz

"Articles about bad sources"... I need a more coherent summary. Does it mean we use shitty sources for that article? Does it mean we sourced things poorly? Does it mean the person covered is themselves a poor source, and if so - a poor source for bunk or truth? I can't make heads or tails of this template. It needs to be explained before I can even decide what my precious heart feels about it. Thank you. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:18, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Seeing the pages it is used on, I suppose it is intended for people who are bad sources (Alex Jones, The Donald, etc)--JorisEnter (talk) 22:19, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

I find that it's a confusing template, if so. It'll easily be able to be used for 90% of the people we cover on this site? I don't like this at all, buddy... Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

What happened?

All of the sudden there are no articles with this category...WeakMindedSkeptic (talk) 03:53, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Cause it's a really confusing template which, besides the very nice icon, added nothing? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:04, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Alright gotcha.--WeakMindedSkeptic (talk) 16:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)