User talk:JorisEnter

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>
This user likes a troll-free talk page. Revert away!

How were the pages I added the alt-right category to not part of the alt right?[edit]

How? (talk) 14:00, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


I reuploaded the image without metadata. Here's security tips:

  1. Always remember to clean your metadata.
  2. Always remember to check for metadata.
  3. Don't have information entered onto forms or computers that you don't want others to see.
  4. There's a tool called Metadata Anonymisation Toolkit that you might want to check out.

€h33s3βurg3rF@€3 Spinning-Burger.gif (talkstalk)

Ah, thanks for that. I didn't know my computer recorded metadata and the like, but apparently it does.--JorisEnter (talk) 18:46, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

On Milo Being a 'Professional Victim'[edit]

The cite note links to a Mashable article which, at no point, shows Milo describing himself as a professional victim. You need to either A) Reinstate my edit. B) Update the cite note to one in which Milo describes himself as a professional victim. Or C) remove the phrase "self-described".

My edit was 100% valid given this site's policy against libel in articles about living people.— Unsigned, by: DeusKek1987 / talk / contribs 23:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

See this.--JorisEnter (talk) 23:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Also: On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: SigButt.png on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
You didn't address my criticism. We could argue until the cows come home over whether or not he's a professional victim but the fact is unless you have a quote in which he calls himself a "professional victim", it isn't "self-described." DeusKek1987 (talk) 23:13, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
You can't demand a public apology without the implicit premise that you have been victimized by the relevant party. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
I tweaked the phrasing slightly. Your thoughts? DeusKek1987 (talk) 23:17, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Seems perfectly fine to me. The man is a professional victim. The question of if he self-describes as such is contingent on finding a quote where he does that. I couldn't see that he did in the source, so your edit appears factual to me. Importantly, we still underscore that the man is a professional victim — which is also factual. Everybody wins. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Indeed. He'd never self-identify as a professional victim even though he undoubtedly is one. Cheers. DeusKek1987 (talk) 23:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Das war ein BEFEHL!!![edit]

You've been nominated to the RationalMedia Foundation election. Please accept or decline; if you accept, you may wish to campaign. Th hug.gif All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 12:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Vandalizing Spree[edit]

Help? Please? RoninMacbeth (talk) 17:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


I changed it from "women and people who self-identify as women" because it implies trans women aren't women. Snokw (talk) 15:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)