There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Category talk:Fundamentalists
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I am surprised we didn't already have this category. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 15:23, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
- Surely there's a category on fundamentalism, but I assume this is strictly for the fundamentalists, so just the individuals (e.g., Fred Phelps) or including organisations (e.g., Westboro Baptist Church). ArmondikoVd hominem 15:37, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
- Nope! I checked. We have no category on fundamentalism. Besides, "fundamentalism" by itself feels ambiguous—it sounds more like an art movement than any kind of zealotry. Our articles are about religious fundamentalism, so that is what the category got named.
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:32, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
- I'm almost embarrassed to say that I have changed my mind (as you can see by this talk page's new location).
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 12:00, 17 February 2009 (EST)
- I'm almost embarrassed to say that I have changed my mind (as you can see by this talk page's new location).
- Nope! I checked. We have no category on fundamentalism. Besides, "fundamentalism" by itself feels ambiguous—it sounds more like an art movement than any kind of zealotry. Our articles are about religious fundamentalism, so that is what the category got named.