Category talk:Myths and legends

Not too sure about Biblical literalism being here. I mean it exists, it's real. We may not like it and think that it's based on myths - but the thing itself exists.--Bob_M (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2007 (CDT)

OK - I've taken it out.--Bob_M (talk) 04:41, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

I am going to take all the flood pages out because I have included category:global flood into this category. - Icewedge 14:07, 2 August 2007 (CDT)

Mythology

Category:Mythology & Category:Myths and legends are both inside each other, & seem to be duplicate, unless there is some subtle distinction that I'm missing. Should they be merged? Wëäŝëïöïď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 21:27, 18 February 2009 (EST)

I think that was me. I didn't like the catigory "myths and legends" for the study of mythology, but forgot to shift the myths to mythology...(legends, too). Myths & legends should probably be a sub set of mythology, or, each mytho-setting should be a sub set "norse mythology" "greek mythology" etc. Sorry about that.--En attendant Godot_{"«Curiosity is insubordination in its purest form. V.Nabokov»} 21:57, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Surely we only need one of those cats? Are they that distinct? ħuman 22:12, 18 February 2009 (EST)