There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Category talk:Myths and legends
Not too sure about Biblical literalism being here. I mean it exists, it's real. We may not like it and think that it's based on myths - but the thing itself exists.--Bob_M (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2007 (CDT)
- I am going to take all the flood pages out because I have included category:global flood into this category. - Icewedge 14:07, 2 August 2007 (CDT)
Mythology[edit]
Category:Mythology & Category:Myths and legends are both inside each other, & seem to be duplicate, unless there is some subtle distinction that I'm missing. Should they be merged? WẽãšẽĩõĩďMethinks it is a Weasel 21:27, 18 February 2009 (EST)
- I think that was me. I didn't like the catigory "myths and legends" for the study of mythology, but forgot to shift the myths to mythology...(legends, too). Myths & legends should probably be a sub set of mythology, or, each mytho-setting should be a sub set "norse mythology" "greek mythology" etc. Sorry about that.--
En attendant Godot"«Her intense and pure religiousness took the form of her having equal faith in the existence of another world and in the impossibility of comprehending it in terms of earthly life. V.Nabokov» 21:57, 18 February 2009 (EST)
- Surely we only need one of those cats? Are they that distinct? ħuman
22:12, 18 February 2009 (EST)
- Surely we only need one of those cats? Are they that distinct? ħuman