Category talk:Myths and legends

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Not too sure about Biblical literalism being here. I mean it exists, it's real. We may not like it and think that it's based on myths - but the thing itself exists.--Bob_M (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2007 (CDT)

OK - I've taken it out.--Bob_M (talk) 04:41, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
I am going to take all the flood pages out because I have included category:global flood into this category. - Icewedge 14:07, 2 August 2007 (CDT)

Mythology[edit]

Category:Mythology & Category:Myths and legends are both inside each other, & seem to be duplicate, unless there is some subtle distinction that I'm missing. Should they be merged? WëäŝëïöïďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 21:27, 18 February 2009 (EST)

I think that was me. I didn't like the catigory "myths and legends" for the study of mythology, but forgot to shift the myths to mythology...(legends, too). Myths & legends should probably be a sub set of mythology, or, each mytho-setting should be a sub set "norse mythology" "greek mythology" etc. Sorry about that.--Sun mowse.pngEn attendant Godot"«Her intense and pure religiousness took the form of her having equal faith in the existence of another world and in the impossibility of comprehending it in terms of earthly life. V.Nabokov» 21:57, 18 February 2009 (EST)
Surely we only need one of those cats? Are they that distinct? ħumanUser talk:Human 22:12, 18 February 2009 (EST)