There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Category talk:Self-published work
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I really don't see the point of this category. human 20:46, 9 April 2008 (EDT)
- I still don't. Deleting in one... two... three... ħuman
00:36, 5 February 2009 (EST)
- We're supposed to wait for one or two more people to weigh in before deleting established pages, Huw.
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:53, 5 February 2009 (EST)
- Jacob, it's not an "established page". It was a carry-over from Susan's importing the WP copyright templates. And there were only 3 inhabitants of it. ħuman
01:40, 5 February 2009 (EST)
- ...Oh. I just saw how "old" it was (April '08) and figured that there was a reason it had lasted this long. Sorry for lecturing you.
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 01:55, 5 February 2009 (EST)
- No big deal. I just dug into what it was and saw it wasn't doing much for us. ħuman
03:08, 5 February 2009 (EST)
- No big deal. I just dug into what it was and saw it wasn't doing much for us. ħuman
- ...Oh. I just saw how "old" it was (April '08) and figured that there was a reason it had lasted this long. Sorry for lecturing you.
- Jacob, it's not an "established page". It was a carry-over from Susan's importing the WP copyright templates. And there were only 3 inhabitants of it. ħuman
- We're supposed to wait for one or two more people to weigh in before deleting established pages, Huw.