2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

Conservapedia talk:Andrew Schlafly/List of supposed expertise

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Organization of Article[edit]

These bullets should be alphabetized. Also, might there be a way to organize them into sections? ħumanUser talk:Human 20:53, 27 March 2009 (EDT)

I'm not against alphabetizing, but I think that adding sections is unnecessary since some sections would be little more than a word. I also will be cutting anything unsourced unless there is a complaint. EternalCritic 14:37, 28 March 2009 (EDT)
One section could be "Miscellaneous"? Anyway, they're only "needed" if 1. teh page ends up quite long (several screens?) and/or 2. there are fairly apparent categories of his "expertise" claims. ħumanUser talk:Human 16:14, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

Comparison[edit]

Perhaps a historical comparison to some of our more gifted historical figures. I can think of only a couple people who may have more expertise than Andy. L. Ron Hubbard, master of most modern disciplines, Turkmenbashi who wrote a book so awesome it's its country's bible and sole textbook, and, of course, Kim Jong Il who gets multiple hole-in-ones per round of golf. Teabag 03:59, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

I fixed your L Ron & Kim links... anyway, doesn't Jong get multiple holes-in-one on individual holes? ħumanUser talk:Human 16:15, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

Move[edit]

To CP space. ТyTalk. 05:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes. Done. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. ТyTalk. 05:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Schlafly's linguistic abilities[edit]

What is his opinion of this language?

And if one adjusts human ages to the calendar of Ceres many great inventors were teenagers or younger. Anna Livia (talk) 22:16, 16 May 2020 (UTC)