Conservapedia talk:Andrew Schlafly/List of supposed expertise

Organization of Article

These bullets should be alphabetized. Also, might there be a way to organize them into sections? ħuman 20:53, 27 March 2009 (EDT)

I'm not against alphabetizing, but I think that adding sections is unnecessary since some sections would be little more than a word. I also will be cutting anything unsourced unless there is a complaint. EternalCritic 14:37, 28 March 2009 (EDT)

One section could be "Miscellaneous"? Anyway, they're only "needed" if 1. teh page ends up quite long (several screens?) and/or 2. there are fairly apparent categories of his "expertise" claims. ħuman 16:14, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

Comparison

Perhaps a historical comparison to some of our more gifted historical figures. I can think of only a couple people who may have more expertise than Andy. L. Ron Hubbard, master of most modern disciplines, Turkmenbashi who wrote a book so awesome it's its country's bible and sole textbook, and, of course, Kim Jong Il who gets multiple hole-in-ones per round of golf. Teabag 03:59, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

I fixed your L Ron & Kim links... anyway, doesn't Jong get multiple holes-in-one on individual holes? ħuman 16:15, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

Move

To CP space. Тy^Talk. 05:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes. Done. ħuman 05:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. Тy^Talk. 05:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Schlafly's linguistic abilities

What is his opinion of this language?

And if one adjusts human ages to the calendar of Ceres many great inventors were teenagers or younger. Anna Livia (talk) 22:16, 16 May 2020 (UTC)