Conservapedia talk:Andrew Schlafly/List of supposed expertise

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Organization of Article[edit]

These bullets should be alphabetized. Also, might there be a way to organize them into sections? ħumanUser talk:Human 20:53, 27 March 2009 (EDT)

I'm not against alphabetizing, but I think that adding sections is unnecessary since some sections would be little more than a word. I also will be cutting anything unsourced unless there is a complaint. EternalCritic 14:37, 28 March 2009 (EDT)
One section could be "Miscellaneous"? Anyway, they're only "needed" if 1. teh page ends up quite long (several screens?) and/or 2. there are fairly apparent categories of his "expertise" claims. ħumanUser talk:Human 16:14, 31 March 2009 (EDT)


Perhaps a historical comparison to some of our more gifted historical figures. I can think of only a couple people who may have more expertise than Andy. L. Ron Hubbard, master of most modern disciplines, Turkmenbashi who wrote a book so awesome it's its country's bible and sole textbook, and, of course, Kim Jong Il who gets multiple hole-in-ones per round of golf. Teabag 03:59, 31 March 2009 (EDT)

I fixed your L Ron & Kim links... anyway, doesn't Jong get multiple holes-in-one on individual holes? ħumanUser talk:Human 16:15, 31 March 2009 (EDT)


To CP space. ТyTalk. 05:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes. Done. ħumanUser talk:Human 05:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. ТyTalk. 05:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Schlafly's linguistic abilities[edit]

What is his opinion of this language?

And if one adjusts human ages to the calendar of Ceres many great inventors were teenagers or younger. Anna Livia (talk) 22:16, 16 May 2020 (UTC)