Conservapedia talk:Last Wordism

I'm going to change the inventor of last wordism to an actual person, as opposed to an online entity because 1. People do things, not websites, and 2. It makes for good continuity with/a nice set up for the last line in the article. Revert if desired. PFoster 12:09, 18 December 2007 (EST)

Actual meaning

When accused of having the "need" to have the last word it is implicit upon the accused to understand that the "discussion is over", IOW, the accuser simply tells the accused that no further input is desired, á la "I dares ya to knock this a-here chip offen my shoulder."

So the actual meaning is a disinvitation to discussion.

CЯacke® 12:16, 18 December 2007 (EST)

But it's disinvitation + "You're at fault," which is more invidious.-αmεσ (tinker) 12:22, 18 December 2007 (EST)

Paradox

By telling someone that they can't have the last word - aren't you just trying to ensure that you'll get the last word?--Danielfolsom 17:12, 27 January 2008 (EST)

Only a liberal like you would try to get the last word by making such a fuss out of such a technicality. --מְתֻרְגְּמָן ^{שְׁלֹום}

Oh no we wouldn't, that's typical liberal deceit Silver Sloth 21:19, 27 January 2008 (EST)

I got the last word!!! Or did I? Only way to be sure is to block y'all foreverzzz!!!!! Hahaahah ehheeh hAhaherh ahEAHha hahhehh!!! human 23:07, 28 January 2008 (EST)

Title

This should be in the conservapedia namespace... ħuman 16:40, 29 June 2008 (EDT)

Done :) SirChuckB^{Further bulletins as events warrant} 21:33, 29 June 2008 (EDT)