Conservapedia talk:Slovenia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Do we really want to have individual articles criticizing every random CP article?[edit]
No. Delete. P-Foster (talk) 13:17, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to agree. Maybe look at CP's country articles as a whole - besides them being copy/pastas from the CIA - and seeing how they differ from reality. But individual articles - unless we're doing a side-by-side refutation of some of the crazier stuff - we don't need. --PsyGremlinПоговорите! 13:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Plus, this thing is really poorly written. Human would vape it on contact just for that. P-Foster (talk) 13:26, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Plus plus, this is a rare instance where CP is actually right. Slovenia is a liberal democracy and has the highest living standard in Eastern Europe. Röstigraben (talk) 13:51, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete this. I have no qualms with documenting CP's minutiae, but this is way too information free.--User:Brxbrx/sig 14:19, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Plus plus, this is a rare instance where CP is actually right. Slovenia is a liberal democracy and has the highest living standard in Eastern Europe. Röstigraben (talk) 13:51, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Plus, this thing is really poorly written. Human would vape it on contact just for that. P-Foster (talk) 13:26, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
You guys don't live in Slovenia... Whatever, delete if you must. -- DasRationalpersone 
(Annoy me!) 14:26, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- You have to understand, this isn't aimed at you personally. It's just that if we were to criticise every CP article individually, we might as well just mirror the site here. If it's a flagship page then sure, or if there's a trend, such as Andy abuse and ignorance of English, then yes. In this case, if CP's general geographic info is pants, then a collective article can be written, but not one for each country. --PsyGremlinParlez! 14:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)