RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3900Goal: $6000


From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Debate.png This is a Debate page.
Feel free to add your own spin on the story. Please keep it civil!
Information icon.svg This debate was created by RightfulGod.


Governments are unnecessary. RightfulGod (talk) 07:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


Whether or not governments are necessary is irrelevant because they often form naturally regardless of their necessity. Sinclair Sanguine talk to Sinclair 17:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Related Query[edit]

Regardless, are governments beneficial? Sinclair Sanguine talk to Sinclair 17:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

An assertion, which does not (strictly speaking) address the proposition[edit]

Governments are a naturally emerging phenomenon which will resurface following any hypothetical abolition of the world's governments. WalkerWalkerWalker 07:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)


Natural emergence does not indicate necessity. Example: The use of violence to solve political issues emerged naturally, but is often deemed unnecessary whenever diplomacy can effectively solve a political issue. Sinclair Sanguine talk to Sinclair 17:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Alternative Proposition[edit]

Hierarchy within governments is unnecessary. Sinclair Sanguine talk to Sinclair 17:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)