|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Debate:Anarchy
|
This is a Debate page. Feel free to add your own spin on the story. Please keep it civil!
|
Proposition[edit]
Governments are unnecessary. RightfulGod (talk) 07:24, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Assertion[edit]
Whether or not governments are necessary is irrelevant because they often form naturally regardless of their necessity. Sinclair Sanguine talk to Sinclair 17:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Related Query[edit]
Regardless, are governments beneficial? Sinclair Sanguine talk to Sinclair 17:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
An assertion, which does not (strictly speaking) address the proposition[edit]
Governments are a naturally emerging phenomenon which will resurface following any hypothetical abolition of the world's governments. WalkerWalkerWalker 07:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Counter-Assertion[edit]
Natural emergence does not indicate necessity. Example: The use of violence to solve political issues emerged naturally, but is often deemed unnecessary whenever diplomacy can effectively solve a political issue. Sinclair Sanguine talk to Sinclair 17:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Alternative Proposition[edit]
Hierarchy within governments is unnecessary. Sinclair Sanguine talk to Sinclair 17:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)