User talk:PacWalker
Contents
Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
---|---|---|
jimbo lover | 0 | 00:34, 28 November 2020 |
You're nominated! (again) | 0 | 06:01, 21 December 2015 |
Results | 2 | 16:23, 28 November 2015 |
Do you really have a sockpuppet named PakWalker? | 7 | 04:54, 24 November 2015 |
Revisions | 19 | 17:06, 23 November 2015 |
oh please | 2 | 06:50, 20 November 2015 |
Test | 10 | 17:04, 13 November 2015 |
You're nominated! (again)
You've got the chance for another shot at becoming a mod (a modshot?) in the upcoming by-election. (I've posted it on the PakWalker talkpage too, btw).
Do you really have a sockpuppet named PakWalker?
I just blocked it. But is that really you. It says it says it's an "announced" sockpuppet of yours.
Dude, that's super confusing for software idjits like me! I don't know what you're doing with the Aneris/SJW AfD. Do you think that should stand?
I was redoing the archiving. The preferred method is as follows:
- Leave RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/User:Aneris/SJWMedia alone, except to indicate a result in the heading.
- Remove the line {{RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/User:Aneris/SJWMedia}} from RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Log. This line is what transcludes the deletion discussion for User:Aneris/SJWMedia onto RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Log and ultimately RationalWiki:Articles for deletion.
- Add the line {{RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/User:Aneris/SJWMedia}} to RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Archive 2015. This will cause the deletion discussion for User:Aneris/SJWMedia to be transcluded onto the archive page. Think of like using a template.
I take no opinion on the deletion proposal itself, mostly because there's no point to deleting his whatever and no point to keeping it.
Ok. It looks like you're archiving it with the correct formatting. I got totally wigged out thinking you were some impersonating freak! Jeebus. I'm going back to Netflix.
Revisions
We discussion revision deletion; PacWalker showcases his technical incompetence; Ryulong complains about LQT. Fuck Monobook.
Did you seriously go back and restore every revision I've deleted?
oh please
the ugliest skin is whatever that shit default that wikia has, cannot find links to anything on that.