RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $5800Goal: $6000
Information icon.svg The 2018 moderator election has started! We are electing 6 moderators and 2 alternatives to serve in 2019. Nominate users here and read their campaign slogans here!

User talk:PacWalker

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Archive of boring old-fashioned chatter: 0, (new)

Before you post here: do I really care? If no, will I be amused?
Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
You're nominated! (again)006:01, 21 December 2015
Results216:23, 28 November 2015
Do you really have a sockpuppet named PakWalker?704:54, 24 November 2015
Revisions1917:06, 23 November 2015
oh please206:50, 20 November 2015
Test1017:04, 13 November 2015

You're nominated! (again)

You've got the chance for another shot at becoming a mod (a modshot?) in the upcoming by-election. (I've posted it on the PakWalker talkpage too, btw).

ScepticWombat (talk)06:01, 21 December 2015

Feel free to add them to the "official" page -- it is now editable by sysops.

Fuzzy "Cat" Potato, Jr. (talk/stalk)15:30, 27 November 2015

Can you? I'm out/about.

WalkerWalkerWalker16:02, 27 November 2015

Didn't even buy anything though.

WalkerWalkerWalker16:23, 28 November 2015
 
 

Do you really have a sockpuppet named PakWalker?

I just blocked it. But is that really you. It says it says it's an "announced" sockpuppet of yours.

-Mona- (talk)04:35, 24 November 2015

Yes it is.

WalkerWalkerWalker04:37, 24 November 2015

Dude, that's super confusing for software idjits like me! I don't know what you're doing with the Aneris/SJW AfD. Do you think that should stand?

-Mona- (talk)04:43, 24 November 2015

I was redoing the archiving. The preferred method is as follows:

  1. Leave RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/User:Aneris/SJWMedia alone, except to indicate a result in the heading.
  2. Remove the line {{RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/User:Aneris/SJWMedia}} from RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Log. This line is what transcludes the deletion discussion for User:Aneris/SJWMedia onto RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Log and ultimately RationalWiki:Articles for deletion.
  3. Add the line {{RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/User:Aneris/SJWMedia}} to RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Archive 2015. This will cause the deletion discussion for User:Aneris/SJWMedia to be transcluded onto the archive page. Think of like using a template.
WalkerWalkerWalker04:48, 24 November 2015
 

I take no opinion on the deletion proposal itself, mostly because there's no point to deleting his whatever and no point to keeping it.

WalkerWalkerWalker04:52, 24 November 2015
 

And MediaWiki is objectively horrible as a markup/software/whatever language.

WalkerWalkerWalker04:54, 24 November 2015
 

Ok. It looks like you're archiving it with the correct formatting. I got totally wigged out thinking you were some impersonating freak! Jeebus. I'm going back to Netflix.

-Mona- (talk)04:45, 24 November 2015

Nonono, I'm far too mean to be Mikemikev.

WalkerWalkerWalker04:49, 24 November 2015
 
 
 

Did you seriously go back and restore every revision I've deleted?

—Ryulong (talk)02:01, 20 November 2015

I doubt it. I didn't check what all you have, though.

WalkerWalkerWalker02:04, 20 November 2015

That said, I probably should take a comb through that too.

WalkerWalkerWalker02:09, 20 November 2015

Are you fucking kidding me?

—Ryulong (talk)02:20, 20 November 2015

None of those are revdel worthy

"Paravant" Talk & Contribs02:26, 20 November 2015

That doesn't mean he should be undoing fucking everything and flooding my watchlist with notifications.

Also this threaded format you've instituted sucks balls.

—Ryulong (talk)03:11, 20 November 2015
 
 
 
 

Somebody being dumb and picking low-level trolling of you is not revdel worthy.

"Paravant" Talk & Contribs02:04, 20 November 2015
 

the ugliest skin is whatever that shit default that wikia has, cannot find links to anything on that.

"Paravant" Talk & Contribs06:46, 20 November 2015

Ok. Fine. That is actually objectively true.

WalkerWalkerWalker06:47, 20 November 2015

Though I willingly use, when I bother to use an account, something called "Modern" when i'm on Wikipedia.

"Paravant" Talk & Contribs06:50, 20 November 2015
 
 

derp[1]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. deeeeeeerp
WalkerWalkerWalker10:48, 12 November 2015

[1]

Heelnotes[edit]

  1. derp?
WalkerWalkerWalker10:49, 12 November 2015

What IS this? Why must you raise the dead threads?

Fuzzy "Cat" Potato, Jr. (talk/stalk)14:53, 12 November 2015

This thread isn't dead... And I wanted to see how nicely footnotes and LiquidThreads played with each other.

WalkerWalkerWalker16:18, 12 November 2015

This is disgusting

Fuzzy "Cat" Potato, Jr. (talk/stalk)17:51, 12 November 2015

I'm disgusting.

WalkerWalkerWalker17:55, 12 November 2015