User talk:PacWalker

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Archive of boring old-fashioned chatter: 0, (new)

Before you post here: do I really care? If no, will I be amused?
Start a new discussion

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
You're nominated! (again)006:01, 21 December 2015
Results216:23, 28 November 2015
Do you really have a sockpuppet named PakWalker?704:54, 24 November 2015
Revisions1917:06, 23 November 2015
oh please206:50, 20 November 2015
Test1017:04, 13 November 2015

You're nominated! (again)

You've got the chance for another shot at becoming a mod (a modshot?) in the upcoming by-election. (I've posted it on the PakWalker talkpage too, btw).

ScepticWombat (talk)06:01, 21 December 2015

Feel free to add them to the "official" page -- it is now editable by sysops.

FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk)15:30, 27 November 2015

Can you? I'm out/about.

WalkerWalkerWalker16:02, 27 November 2015

Didn't even buy anything though.

WalkerWalkerWalker16:23, 28 November 2015
 
 

Do you really have a sockpuppet named PakWalker?

I just blocked it. But is that really you. It says it says it's an "announced" sockpuppet of yours.

-Mona- (talk)04:35, 24 November 2015

Yes it is.

WalkerWalkerWalker04:37, 24 November 2015

Dude, that's super confusing for software idjits like me! I don't know what you're doing with the Aneris/SJW AfD. Do you think that should stand?

-Mona- (talk)04:43, 24 November 2015

I was redoing the archiving. The preferred method is as follows:

  1. Leave RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/User:Aneris/SJWMedia alone, except to indicate a result in the heading.
  2. Remove the line {{RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/User:Aneris/SJWMedia}} from RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Log. This line is what transcludes the deletion discussion for User:Aneris/SJWMedia onto RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Log and ultimately RationalWiki:Articles for deletion.
  3. Add the line {{RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/User:Aneris/SJWMedia}} to RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Archive 2015. This will cause the deletion discussion for User:Aneris/SJWMedia to be transcluded onto the archive page. Think of like using a template.
WalkerWalkerWalker04:48, 24 November 2015
 

I take no opinion on the deletion proposal itself, mostly because there's no point to deleting his whatever and no point to keeping it.

WalkerWalkerWalker04:52, 24 November 2015
 

And MediaWiki is objectively horrible as a markup/software/whatever language.

WalkerWalkerWalker04:54, 24 November 2015
 

Ok. It looks like you're archiving it with the correct formatting. I got totally wigged out thinking you were some impersonating freak! Jeebus. I'm going back to Netflix.

-Mona- (talk)04:45, 24 November 2015

Nonono, I'm far too mean to be Mikemikev.

WalkerWalkerWalker04:49, 24 November 2015
 
 
 

Did you seriously go back and restore every revision I've deleted?

—Ryulong (talk)02:01, 20 November 2015

I doubt it. I didn't check what all you have, though.

WalkerWalkerWalker02:04, 20 November 2015

That said, I probably should take a comb through that too.

WalkerWalkerWalker02:09, 20 November 2015

Are you fucking kidding me?

—Ryulong (talk)02:20, 20 November 2015

None of those are revdel worthy

"Paravant" Talk & Contribs02:26, 20 November 2015

That doesn't mean he should be undoing fucking everything and flooding my watchlist with notifications.

Also this threaded format you've instituted sucks balls.

—Ryulong (talk)03:11, 20 November 2015
 
 
 
 

Somebody being dumb and picking low-level trolling of you is not revdel worthy.

"Paravant" Talk & Contribs02:04, 20 November 2015
 

the ugliest skin is whatever that shit default that wikia has, cannot find links to anything on that.

"Paravant" Talk & Contribs06:46, 20 November 2015

Ok. Fine. That is actually objectively true.

WalkerWalkerWalker06:47, 20 November 2015

Though I willingly use, when I bother to use an account, something called "Modern" when i'm on Wikipedia.

"Paravant" Talk & Contribs06:50, 20 November 2015
 
 

derp[1]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. deeeeeeerp
WalkerWalkerWalker10:48, 12 November 2015

[1]

Heelnotes[edit]

  1. derp?
WalkerWalkerWalker10:49, 12 November 2015

What IS this? Why must you raise the dead threads?

FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk)14:53, 12 November 2015

This thread isn't dead... And I wanted to see how nicely footnotes and LiquidThreads played with each other.

WalkerWalkerWalker16:18, 12 November 2015

This is disgusting

FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk)17:51, 12 November 2015

I'm disgusting.

WalkerWalkerWalker17:55, 12 November 2015