2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $2973.89Goal: $10000

User talk:PacWalker

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive of boring old-fashioned chatter: , (new)

Before you post here: do I really care? If no, will I be amused?

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
jimbo lover000:34, 28 November 2020
You're nominated! (again)006:01, 21 December 2015
Results216:23, 28 November 2015
Do you really have a sockpuppet named PakWalker?704:54, 24 November 2015
Revisions1917:06, 23 November 2015
oh please206:50, 20 November 2015
Test1017:04, 13 November 2015
Collapse
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 00:34, 28 November 2020

.

CastrateJimboWales (talk)23:44, 27 November 2020

You're nominated! (again)

Collapse

You've got the chance for another shot at becoming a mod (a modshot?) in the upcoming by-election. (I've posted it on the PakWalker talkpage too, btw).

ScepticWombat (talk)06:01, 21 December 2015
Collapse

Feel free to add them to the "official" page -- it is now editable by sysops.

Fuzzy. Cat. Potato! (talk/stalk)15:30, 27 November 2015
Collapse

Can you? I'm out/about.

WalkerWalkerWalker16:02, 27 November 2015
Collapse

Didn't even buy anything though.

WalkerWalkerWalker16:23, 28 November 2015
 
 

Do you really have a sockpuppet named PakWalker?

Collapse

I just blocked it. But is that really you. It says it says it's an "announced" sockpuppet of yours.

-Mona- (talk)04:35, 24 November 2015
Collapse

Yes it is.

WalkerWalkerWalker04:37, 24 November 2015
Collapse

Dude, that's super confusing for software idjits like me! I don't know what you're doing with the Aneris/SJW AfD. Do you think that should stand?

-Mona- (talk)04:43, 24 November 2015
Collapse

I was redoing the archiving. The preferred method is as follows:

  1. Leave RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/User:Aneris/SJWMedia alone, except to indicate a result in the heading.
  2. Remove the line {{RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/User:Aneris/SJWMedia}} from RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Log. This line is what transcludes the deletion discussion for User:Aneris/SJWMedia onto RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Log and ultimately RationalWiki:Articles for deletion.
  3. Add the line {{RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/User:Aneris/SJWMedia}} to RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Archive 2015. This will cause the deletion discussion for User:Aneris/SJWMedia to be transcluded onto the archive page. Think of like using a template.
WalkerWalkerWalker04:48, 24 November 2015
 
Collapse

I take no opinion on the deletion proposal itself, mostly because there's no point to deleting his whatever and no point to keeping it.

WalkerWalkerWalker04:52, 24 November 2015
 
Collapse

And MediaWiki is objectively horrible as a markup/software/whatever language.

WalkerWalkerWalker04:54, 24 November 2015
 
Collapse

Ok. It looks like you're archiving it with the correct formatting. I got totally wigged out thinking you were some impersonating freak! Jeebus. I'm going back to Netflix.

-Mona- (talk)04:45, 24 November 2015
Collapse

Nonono, I'm far too mean to be Mikemikev.

WalkerWalkerWalker04:49, 24 November 2015
 
 
 
Collapse

Did you seriously go back and restore every revision I've deleted?

—Ryulong (talk)02:01, 20 November 2015
Collapse

I doubt it. I didn't check what all you have, though.

WalkerWalkerWalker02:04, 20 November 2015
Collapse

That said, I probably should take a comb through that too.

WalkerWalkerWalker02:09, 20 November 2015
Collapse

Are you fucking kidding me?

—Ryulong (talk)02:20, 20 November 2015
Collapse

None of those are revdel worthy

"Paravant" Talk & Contribs02:26, 20 November 2015
Collapse

That doesn't mean he should be undoing fucking everything and flooding my watchlist with notifications.

Also this threaded format you've instituted sucks balls.

—Ryulong (talk)03:11, 20 November 2015
 
 
 
 
Collapse

Somebody being dumb and picking low-level trolling of you is not revdel worthy.

"Paravant" Talk & Contribs02:04, 20 November 2015
 
Collapse

the ugliest skin is whatever that shit default that wikia has, cannot find links to anything on that.

"Paravant" Talk & Contribs06:46, 20 November 2015
Collapse

Ok. Fine. That is actually objectively true.

WalkerWalkerWalker06:47, 20 November 2015
Collapse

Though I willingly use, when I bother to use an account, something called "Modern" when i'm on Wikipedia.

"Paravant" Talk & Contribs06:50, 20 November 2015
 
 
Collapse

derp[1]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. deeeeeeerp
WalkerWalkerWalker10:48, 12 November 2015
Collapse

[1]

Heelnotes[edit]

  1. derp?
WalkerWalkerWalker10:49, 12 November 2015
Collapse

What IS this? Why must you raise the dead threads?

Fuzzy. Cat. Potato! (talk/stalk)14:53, 12 November 2015
Collapse

This thread isn't dead... And I wanted to see how nicely footnotes and LiquidThreads played with each other.

WalkerWalkerWalker16:18, 12 November 2015