| There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with |
Debate talk:Liberal beliefs/Tom and Rem
Who ever said:
- What most of us favor is should stick to speaking for him/her self and leave the rest of us out of it. Why is it that so many folks want to tell us what others think? Carptrash 00:07, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
- After looking at this page a bit longer I take it all back. I am outta here. Carptrash 00:17, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
I just found this debate page. How delightful it is.
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:10, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
- We live but to serve ;) --Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 00:12, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
- Yes, carry on, my loyal vassals. : )
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:18, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
- I agree. Although I intrude from time to time (I think I do, here?), I love the peeling of the onion. It makes me cry. ħuman
00:36, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
- I agree. Although I intrude from time to time (I think I do, here?), I love the peeling of the onion. It makes me cry. ħuman
- Yes, carry on, my loyal vassals. : )
Convenient edit button[edit]
Would someone please break the page into sections, for ease of navigation?
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 15:32, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
- Yeah, because of the length of most of the comments, there could almost be a ===button X=== after every other comment. ħuman
17:12, 8 September 2008 (EDT)
- I hope that's easier on the eyes.--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 04:32, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
- This needs the side-by-side Rx. Who's up fer it? CЯacke® 11:40, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
- You think? I think it would make it harder to Rem & Tom to add their comments? And what to with 3rd party intruders? ħuman
13:26, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
- A third column, perhaps? : )
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 13:52, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
- Hehe, put me in the fifth column... ħuman
14:26, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
- Hehe, put me in the fifth column... ħuman
- A third column, perhaps? : )
- You think? I think it would make it harder to Rem & Tom to add their comments? And what to with 3rd party intruders? ħuman
- I'd appreciate a minimum of interlocution. I did separate this page and title it thusly just so I could have a discussion with him, after all.--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 19:14, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
- True, but also, it's in the debate space, which is usually "community". Anyway, I only make occasional comments mostly. I'll try to butt out ;) I guess I could use the talk page, but I don't think Rum would answer me here. I am really amused by how he seems to think schools and school funding work. Oh, and learning... ħuman
19:35, 9 September 2008 (EDT) - Eh, sorry, Tom. I do understand the exclusive nature of this debate. I don't plan to make a habit of butting in.
Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 21:24, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
- I don't mean to chastise, and you are certainly welcome to comment. It's just that it's just him over here arguing for his viewpoints; he doesn't have any other libertarian buddies. It's way too easy for discussions like this to turn into a mess as everyone jumps on the poor guy.--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 03:56, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
- Yes, that is mostly why I agreed to respect the one-on-one nature of the discussion - simple fairness. Although it's really hard not to comment on some of the things... ħuman
17:45, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
- Yes, that is mostly why I agreed to respect the one-on-one nature of the discussion - simple fairness. Although it's really hard not to comment on some of the things... ħuman
- I don't mean to chastise, and you are certainly welcome to comment. It's just that it's just him over here arguing for his viewpoints; he doesn't have any other libertarian buddies. It's way too easy for discussions like this to turn into a mess as everyone jumps on the poor guy.--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 03:56, 10 September 2008 (EDT)
- True, but also, it's in the debate space, which is usually "community". Anyway, I only make occasional comments mostly. I'll try to butt out ;) I guess I could use the talk page, but I don't think Rum would answer me here. I am really amused by how he seems to think schools and school funding work. Oh, and learning... ħuman
- This needs the side-by-side Rx. Who's up fer it? CЯacke® 11:40, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
- I hope that's easier on the eyes.--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 04:32, 9 September 2008 (EDT)
Boring...[edit]
The song contest between Chaos! and AKjeldsen is a much funnier exchange. Editor at CPLiar at RP! 10:31, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
- Yup, we're really getting to the grind now that I have him pinned on a specific topic and he's being forced to be specific. It won't be pretty.--Tom Moorefiat justitia ruat coelum 05:02, 23 September 2008 (EDT)