Debate talk:Logical proof of the existence of God
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Cue the bickering between Jeeves and AKjeldsen in 3, 2, 1... Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 05:18, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- I particularly like the variant spelling : Title v Content. Toast 05:33, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- I don't understand. What are you talking about? Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 05:35, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- Existance : existence. Toast 05:48, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- Ah, I see now. Thanks. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 17:16, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- Existance : existence. Toast 05:48, 4 January 2009 (EST)
- I don't understand. What are you talking about? Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 05:35, 4 January 2009 (EST)
Side by side[edit]
Would this be better as a side-by-side so that we can analyse it point by point?--Bobbing up 06:24, 4 January 2009 (EST)