Essay talk:A rational response to Mitt Romney's Theocracy Speech

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I'm looking forward to this.-αmεσ (soldier) 15:29, 7 December 2007 (EST)

Me to. I hate theocracy. --Signed by Elassint the Great Hi! 15:35, 7 December 2007 (EST)
I need wiki help adding more sections.--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 15:47, 7 December 2007 (EST)
Can we all play, or are you keepin' this to yourself, Doc? And if we all can, maybe it should be moved to a subpage of Mitt Romney? ("Mitt Romney/A rational response to Mitt Romney's Theocracy Speech") humanUser talk:Human 15:50, 7 December 2007 (EST)
In such a case do we need a NOMA and a non NOMA version?--Bobbing up 15:53, 7 December 2007 (EST)
I'm not sure how NOMA comes into play. I'm going, at least, on the fact that he makes idiotic statements about american history and the nature of freedom as it relates to religion.--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 15:56, 7 December 2007 (EST)
Ah Ok. I'd just glanced at a couple of lines and thought that it might come up. If not then there's no issue.--Bobbing up 15:59, 7 December 2007 (EST)
I'll need lots of help. I'm just trying to squeeze the speech text in to get started.--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 15:51, 7 December 2007 (EST)


I need a few more sections to fit the whole idiotic speech and I'm a wikidiot.--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 15:50, 7 December 2007 (EST)

Done!-αmεσ (soldier) 15:54, 7 December 2007 (EST)
Thx!--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 15:55, 7 December 2007 (EST)
Do this: Insert "BREAK HERE" everywhere you want new sections to start and tell me/us when you're done. While doing the wiki work, (if I do it), I'll mark the article "locked" so we don't waste time/get conflicts. I'll resection it (not your bowel) at the places you mark. OK? Or is it all done now? humanUser talk:Human 15:55, 7 December 2007 (EST)

By the way, Doc, there are instructions at the bottom for adding extra sections... humanUser talk:Human 15:56, 7 December 2007 (EST)

I don't know how to fix it, but don't we have an overabundance of section fives?--Bobbing up 15:57, 7 December 2007 (EST)
Ames took care of it.--PalMD-If it looks like a donut, eat it 15:58, 7 December 2007 (EST)
Did he? There are still seven of them on my PC.--Bobbing up 16:00, 7 December 2007 (EST)
Yes, he did. After we're done breaking it up/adding new sections, we can renumber them. I want a break in section one where I marked it, for instance. humanUser talk:Human 16:03, 7 December 2007 (EST)

section headers[edit]

Idea: instead of numbers, how about "topical" titling? EG "The Greatest Generation" for #1, "Yes there sure were" for our response? Then there is no need to renumber if we break sections up in the middle? humanUser talk:Human 16:07, 7 December 2007 (EST)

Changing Title[edit]

Since Romney stands to be a player in the 2012 election, this speech of his might be interesting to reference. Would anyone care (since PalMD isn't here) if I relocated/renamed it with (2007) in the title, so people know it's an older speech. And then, would any one care if we linked the Romney page to this speech so people can read his ideas on what our nation should be, under his leadership?--Pink mowse.pngGodotTue pour toujours, et tu veux vivre aussi. 00:08, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

I know we don't delete essays but this never got very far and wasn't much of an "essay" in the first place. I'd much prefer if it was taken out of Essay space and the mob at large could have a go at it. Redchuck.gif ГенгисYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.Moderator 21:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)