2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

Essay talk:Moving Beyond Conservapedia

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I agree with you 100%--Bob_M (talk) 16:27, 5 July 2007 (CDT)

I like it (despite being the only RW editor who was proud to be termed a "cyber vandal") liessmokemirrors 16:28, 5 July 2007 (CDT)
I agree completely. As I've been attempting to recruit editors, I think the whole inyourface thing with CP turns people off...it makes them feel like outsiders.--PalMD-Goatspeed! 16:38, 5 July 2007 (CDT)
I agree a lot...when i first came here (i mean the absolute 1st main page visit) what first caught my eye was not CP...it was the bit about "refuting the anti-science movement". So, yea, I wholeheartedly agree that RW should focus not just on CP...lets face it, there is plenty of OTHER ridiculousness[1] out there, and all of theme deserve equal time..... on our refutation pages.-- ♠ ŖєuĻєəux ♠say wнäτ? 12:42, 17 August 2007 (CDT)