Essay talk:RationalWiki's coverage of politics

Topic

I agree with your points. I remember something White Wing Dove said in his campaign about looking for grants and stuff. We need to substantially limit this type of article if we are going to be taken seriously. Accordingly, I think we should limit our political content to basic articles on authoritarian ideologies, and relegate everything else to Draftspace. If we want to viable in the future, we need to do something about these TACs (as you call them). RoninMacbeth (talk) 04:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

I honestly think most articles on alive people are shit. I honestly wouldn't miss any of the articles if all of them were deleted. The articles tend to cover internet drama, have defamation, and are a pain to manage. RationalWiki has shitty quality control, so I doubt most people articles will be "fixed".—HamburgerPlate  (talk • stalk) 04:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

We need to come up with some sort of quality control standard that the mob would approve of. We're discussing the removal of dozens, if not hundreds, or articles, potentially en masse. There's no way we'd be able to do that without a fairly tight standard. RoninMacbeth (talk) 05:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)