There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
- They look like less of a troll, and more just an idiot. —вιgℓʝвιgℓ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ/sᴛᴀʟᴋ) 10:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
For your eyes only
Do youuuuuuuuuu like uuuuuuuuuuusss?
- Non-serious answer: duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude.
- Serious answer: I like RationalWiki, but think it has some issues. I will poke the mob at an attempt at some change, but I’m not going to make myself a martyr. I think articles about people sometimes go into the libel area and the wiki has quality control issues.—127.0.0.1 (talk • stalk) 04:41, 24 September 2017 (UTC)