2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000
Balloons.svg

Fun:Schlafly Quote Generator

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Wigocp.svg This Conservapedia-related article is of largely historical interest and is no longer the focus of RationalWiki today.
Conservapedia (and religious fundamentalism to an extent) was a major focal point in the early history of RationalWiki, but long ago ceased coming up with new ways to appall and amuse.
Our energies are now spent debunking other, fresher examples of pseudoscientific claims, authoritarianism, and deceit.
For RationalWiki's less ancient content, try the Best of RationalWiki.

Click for a new quote!

"Anonymous User" (you can't even post in your own real name), I doubt you have a clue about modern science. I looked at many of your edits before reverting them and you are unlike 99% of evolutionists, who avoid the Bible like the plague and even discourage others from reading it, so I'm confident you're lying. I urge you, I beseech you, I beg you: accept that chivalry was and is an ideal for all to strive for. It is very effective in reducing and eliminating friction, insults, hard-feelings, and accidents, not to mention that it stops talk pollution. Observation and logic dictate that the more something is irrationally denied, the more persuasive it becomes. How about learning first, and then preaching second?? Why don't you object to how Richard Dawkins called for the arrest of the Pope?--Aschlafly 14:39, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Explanation[edit]

The above is constructed almost entirely from things Andrew Schlafly has actually said in his postings at Conservapedia. We made up maybe 1% of them to get the thing going and to test grammar issues, but they're representative and you can spot them — they're usually the less insane sounding ones. And lest you question the accuracy of this infernal device, it passes the Turing Test (or perhaps Andy fails it; we're not sure).

Talk page lacking that Schlafly je ne sais quoi? Try the SQG template!