Balloons.svg

Fun:Schlafly Quote Generator

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Wigocp.svg This Conservapedia-related article is of largely historical interest and is no longer the focus of RationalWiki today.
Conservapedia (and religious fundamentalism to an extent) was a major focal point in the early history of RationalWiki, but long ago ceased coming up with new ways to appall and amuse.
Our energies are now spent debunking other, fresher examples of pseudoscientific claims, authoritarianism, and deceit.
For RationalWiki's less ancient content, try the Best of RationalWiki.

Click for a new quote!

"Anonymous User", your "word-to-substance ratio" is very high; you are likely a liberal. I've managed to read your rants and I did reflect on how your 'experts' perceive American conservatives, and I've concluded they are clueless, so clearly you're a victim of Professor values. Like all liberals, you deny that women knowing their place reduces autism. Liberals don't like it, but saying something is "controversial" is meaningless and only designed to confuse or legitimize opposition. If you can't explain in your own words why you think that school was founded by atheists and is so prominent today, then give up and try debating a topic you can put in your own words. After a while, the liberal nonsense is so obvious that we don't even bother commenting on it.--aschlafly 00:39, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Explanation[edit]

The above is constructed almost entirely from things Andrew Schlafly has actually said in his postings at Conservapedia. We made up maybe 1% of them to get the thing going and to test grammar issues, but they're representative and you can spot them — they're usually the less insane sounding ones. And lest you question the accuracy of this infernal device, it passes the Turing Test (or perhaps Andy fails it; we're not sure).

Talk page lacking that Schlafly je ne sais quoi? Try the SQG template!