Fun talk:Daniel Dennett
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This was taken out of the main article and fun articles like this serve a useful purpose. Youngsters surfing the web, even older surfers read the fun articles, they then stay on our website and find out what are problems with religion and pseudoscience. Proxima Centauri (talk) 12:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, no. This serves no purpose. ТyrannisAn iron, but caring, fist 13:22, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- I see no reason to have a "fun" Daniel Dennette. Either put it in the main page or dump it, I say. I think it could go in the main page, personally. It's a bit of sillyness that we can handle.--
Godot 15:01, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- I see no reason to have a "fun" Daniel Dennette. Either put it in the main page or dump it, I say. I think it could go in the main page, personally. It's a bit of sillyness that we can handle.--
