2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7608.77Goal: $10000

Fun talk:Daniel Dennett

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This was taken out of the main article and fun articles like this serve a useful purpose. Youngsters surfing the web, even older surfers read the fun articles, they then stay on our website and find out what are problems with religion and pseudoscience. Proxima Centauri (talk) 12:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Actually, no. This serves no purpose. ТyrannisAn iron, but caring, fist 13:22, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
I see no reason to have a "fun" Daniel Dennette. Either put it in the main page or dump it, I say. I think it could go in the main page, personally. It's a bit of sillyness that we can handle.--Green mowse.pngGodot 15:01, 29 May 2012 (UTC)