RationalWiki:What is going on at ASK?/March 2010
March 2010[edit]
|
|
1 |
"Choosing to reject evidence simply because you don't agree with the people highlighting the evidence is not a rational argument." Whereas believing the words of a primitive society's priesthood is? |
|
|
-15 |
ASK takes on a decidedly more commercial toneimg. |
|
|
6 |
Phillip lays it all on the table: I'll deal with reality when I have some reality to deal with. |
|
|
1 |
aSK has made a further departure from the reality-based community. |
|
|
-10 |
Revert and Infinite ban # (Block log); 16:59 . . OscarJ (Talk | contribs) blocked Someone (Talk | contribs) with an expiry time of infinite (account creation disabled) (Abusing multiple accounts) |
|
|
0 |
PJR: I never said that evilutionists shouldn't give creationists short shrift. PJR has rather a short memory. |
|
|
2 |
PJR does some stand-up comedy: "Science should explain what happened without ruling out a particular agency a priori." |
|
|
3 |
Following blocks of Teh Terrible Asp, Jeeves, and Editor at CP, PJR announces a new policy at aSK: Insults with "no merit" are to be burned on sight. |
|
|
1 |
PJR: Bigoted comments disputing that CMI personnel are scientists are disallowed. |
|
|
2 |
Remember, Philip is an honest man. Therefore, this is not lying by omission. |
|
|
3 |
March 7: Teh Terrible Asp posts a warning to fellow editors. Two days later, PJR notices it: Revert and one-week block. UPDATE: Jeeves puts up the same text, but only gets three days. |
|
|
1 |
PJR: Conclusions that are based on the evolutionary worldview are disallowed in articles. Or, in English, science is verboten. |
|
|
0 |
Old-earth creationist view of origins: Trolling. UPDATE: Comment restored by, of all people, OscarJ. |
|
|
2 |
|
|
0 |
Oh,look. Daniel1212's given us a lovely new |
|
|
3 |
The |